Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT (2013) vs Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT (2013) vs Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT (2013) Ford ₱1,039,000 | Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (2015) Chevrolet ₱1,103,888 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2013 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1793cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged Common Rail Injection | Naturally Aspirated, DVVTC |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 3700 rpm | 141 PS @ 6300 rpm |
| Max Torque | 330 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 175 Nm @ 3800 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Segment | Pickup | C |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5274 | 4597 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1788 |
| Height (mm) | 1818 | 1477 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2685 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1929 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double wishbone with coil spring | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Springs | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 16" Alloy | 17x7.0" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 16" Alloy | 17x7.0" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R16 | 215/50/R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R16 | 215/50/R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | — |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | — |
Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT (2013) vs Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (2015): which should you buy?
The Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT (₱1,039,000) is the better value for a Filipino buyer prioritizing practicality and durability. At ₱1039000, it is ₱64888 cheaper than the Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (₱1,103888), yet it delivers significantly more power (150 PS vs. 141 PS) and torque (330 Nm vs. 175 Nm) in a rear-wheel-drive pickup with a body-on-frame construction. The Ranger’s 5-speed manual transmission and 2+3 seating capacity align better with daily hauling or rugged use, whereas the Cruze’s 6-speed automatic and sedan profile suit urban commuting. Given the 100000km/3-year warranty on both models, the Ranger’s lower cost and stronger engine make it the wiser long-term choice for most Filipino owners. Availability is noted as discontinued for the Ranger, so securing it may require negotiation.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT costs ₱1,039,000, while the Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT costs ₱1,103,888—the Ranger is ₱64888 cheaper.
Which is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT produces 150 PS of max power, compared to the Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT’s 141 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT is better for daily commuting because it uses a gas engine and has a front-wheel-drive layout, unlike the rear-wheel-drive, diesel-powered Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT.
Why is the Ranger discontinued?
The availability of the Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT is marked as discontinued in the data.