Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT (2013) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT (2013) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT (2013) Ford ₱1,039,000 | Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,099,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2013 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1499cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-Valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged Common Rail Injection | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 3700 rpm | 105 PS |
| Max Torque | 330 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 141 Nm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | Manual 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | MPV AUV |
| Segment | Pickup | MPV |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5274 | 4595 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1750 |
| Height (mm) | 1818 | 1750 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2775 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1929 | 1260 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof. Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double wishbone with coil spring | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Springs | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16" Alloy | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 16" Alloy | 17 |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R16 | 205/55R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R16 | 205/55R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Mechanical |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT (2013) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer deciding between the Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT (2013) and the Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026), the choice hinges on purpose, budget, and power needs. The Ranger is a 2013 pickup with a diesel engine delivering 150 PS and 330 Nm torque, ideal for heavy-duty tasks or off-road use; it costs ₱1,039,000 and offers a 5‑speed manual transmission with RWD. However, it is discontinued, has a body‑on‑frame construction, and seats only five people. The Xpander is a 2026 MPV with a gasoline engine producing 105 PS and 141 Nm, suited for family transport or daily commuting; it costs ₱1,099,000 and features a 5‑speed manual FWD transmission, unibody construction, five doors, and seating for seven. While the Xpander is slightly more expensive, its higher passenger capacity, modern build, and current availability make it a better fit for families or urban users. The Ranger’s lower price and stronger torque favor buyers needing a rugged work vehicle, whereas the Xpander’s practicality and newer model year appeal to those prioritizing comfort and space. Thus, choose the Ranger for work‑oriented tasks and the Xpander for family or daily commuting.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT (2013) is priced at ₱1,039,000, while the Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026) is priced at ₱1,099,000.
Which has more power?
The Ford Ranger delivers 150 PS and 330 Nm torque, whereas the Mitsubishi Xpander produces 105 PS and 141 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Mitsubishi Xpander, with its MPV body type, unibody construction, 5‑door layout, and seating for seven, is more suitable for daily commuting and family use.
Which vehicle is still available?
The Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026) is listed as current, while the Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×2 MT (2013) is discontinued.