Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×4 MT (2013) vs Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×4 MT (2013) vs Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×4 MT (2013) Ford ₱1,199,000 | Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (2015) Chevrolet ₱1,103,888 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2013 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1793cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged Common Rail Injection | Naturally Aspirated, DVVTC |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 3700 rpm | 141 PS @ 6300 rpm |
| Max Torque | 375 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 175 Nm @ 3800 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed M/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Segment | Pickup | C |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5274 | 4597 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1788 |
| Height (mm) | 1818 | 1477 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2685 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1929 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double wishbone with coil spring | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Springs | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 17"x8.0" Alloys | 17x7.0" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 17"x8.0" Alloys | 17x7.0" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 215/50/R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 215/50/R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | — |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | — |
Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×4 MT (2013) vs Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for practicality and affordability, the Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×4 MT is the better choice. It offers more power, torque, and AWD capability at a lower price point compared to the Chevrolet Cruze.
Frequently asked questions
Which car has better fuel efficiency?
The data does not provide specific information on fuel efficiency for either vehicle.
Is one of these cars more powerful than the other?
Yes, the Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×4 MT is more powerful with a max power of 150 PS compared to the Chevrolet Cruze's 141 PS.
Which car is better for daily commuting?
The Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×4 MT is better suited for daily commuting due to its AWD capability and more robust construction, which can handle various road conditions better than a FWD vehicle like the Chevrolet Cruze.
Is one of these cars cheaper?
Yes, the Ford Ranger 2.2 XLS 4×4 MT is cheaper at ₱1,199,000 compared to the Chevrolet Cruze's ₱1,103,888.