Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4×2 AT (2013) vs Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4×2 AT (2013) vs Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4×2 AT (2013) Ford ₱1,279,000 | Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,378,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2013 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1459cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler CRDI | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 3700 rpm | 105 PS |
| Max Torque | 375 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 141 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | MPV AUV |
| Segment | Pickup | MPV |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5274 | 4595 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1790 |
| Height (mm) | 1818 | 1750 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2775 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1929 | 1275 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof. Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double wishbone with coil spring | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf springs | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17"x8.0" Alloys | — |
| Rear Wheels | 17"x8.0" Alloys | — |
| Front Tires | 265/70 R16 | 205/55R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/70 R16 | 205/55R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4×2 AT (2013) vs Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking to purchase a reliable and well-equipped pickup truck with good power-to-weight ratio, the Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4×2 AT (2013) is the better choice. It offers more power, longer warranty, and higher torque compared to the Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT (2026). The Ford Ranger is ideal for those who need a robust vehicle with towing capabilities and durability.
Frequently asked questions
Which car has better fuel efficiency?
The data doesn't provide specific information about fuel efficiency, but both cars use different types of fuels (Diesel vs. Gasoline) which might affect their fuel economy in real-world conditions.
How much power does each car have and is there a significant difference?
Both cars have inline-4 engines, but the Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT has more power with 150 PS compared to the Mitsubishi Xpander Cross 1.5 AT which has 105 PS. The higher power output of the Ford Ranger makes it a better choice for towing and off-road conditions.
Which car is better suited for daily commuting?
The Mitsubishi Xpander Cross, with its FWD setup and more comfortable interior, might be slightly better suited for daily commuting due to easier handling in traffic and comfort for passengers.
How long are the warranty periods for each car?
Both cars come with warranties but the Ford Ranger offers a longer warranty period of 3-years/100,000 km compared to the Mitsubishi Xpander Cross which has a standard 3-years/100,000 km warranty.