Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4×2 MT (2013) vs Mitsubishi ASX GLS (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4×2 MT (2013) vs Mitsubishi ASX GLS (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4×2 MT (2013) Ford ₱1,219,000 | Mitsubishi ASX GLS (2017) Mitsubishi ₱1,215,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2013 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler CRDI | Naturally Aspirated MIVEC |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 120 PS @ 3700 rpm | 150 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 285 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 197 Nm @ 4200 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
| Segment | Pickup | J |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 5274 | 4295 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1770 |
| Height (mm) | 1818 | 1625 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2670 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1929 | 1350 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 63 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double wishbone with coil spring | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf springs | Multi-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 17"x8.0" Alloys | 17x6.5 |
| Rear Wheels | 17"x8.0" Alloys | 17x6.5 |
| Front Tires | 265/70 R16 | 215/60 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/70 R16 | 215/60 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Electronic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt and telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | HID |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | — | Euro-4 |
Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4×2 MT (2013) vs Mitsubishi ASX GLS (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and practical pickup truck with good fuel efficiency, the Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4×2 MT (2013) is the better choice. It offers more power and torque compared to the Mitsubishi ASX GLS, making it suitable for towing and off-road conditions. The Ford's body-on-frame construction also provides a sturdier base than the ASX's unibody design. Despite its age, the Ranger still has a 100,000km/3-years warranty, which is crucial for long-term ownership.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper between the Ford Ranger and Mitsubishi ASX?
The Ford Ranger at ₱1,219,000 is slightly cheaper than the Mitsubishi ASX GLS at ₱1,215,000.
Which car has better fuel efficiency?
Unfortunately, both vehicles use diesel and gasoline respectively, so they don't provide direct comparisons in terms of fuel efficiency. However, the Ford Ranger's engine is more powerful for its displacement, which might imply slightly better performance on the road but no specific fuel economy data.
Which car is better suited for daily commuting?
The Mitsubishi ASX GLS with a 5-speed CVT transmission and Euro-4 emission standard might be easier to handle in city traffic compared to the Ford Ranger's manual gearbox. The ASX also has more seats, which could be an advantage for families or groups.
Which car is better for towing heavy loads?
The Ford Ranger with its 285 Nm of torque and a maximum power output of 120 PS is better suited for towing heavy loads compared to the Mitsubishi ASX GLS, which has only 197 Nm of torque.