Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4×2 MT (2013) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4×2 MT (2013) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4×2 MT (2013) Ford ₱1,219,000 | Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,259,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2013 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1459cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler CRDI | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 120 PS @ 3700 rpm | 105 PS |
| Max Torque | 285 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 141 Nm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | Automatic 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | MPV AUV |
| Segment | Pickup | MPV |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5274 | 4595 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1750 |
| Height (mm) | 1818 | 1750 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2775 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1929 | 1260 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof. Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double wishbone with coil spring | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf springs | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17"x8.0" Alloys | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 17"x8.0" Alloys | 17 |
| Front Tires | 265/70 R16 | 205/55R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/70 R16 | 205/55R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4×2 MT (2013) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026): which should you buy?
The Ford Ranger XLT 2.2 L4 MT offers a good balance of power and practicality despite being discontinued, making it ideal for those looking to replace their older vehicle with something reliable but not necessarily new. The Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT is more recent, offering better fuel efficiency and features like sunroof and more exterior colors, which might appeal to buyers who prioritize modern amenities.
Frequently asked questions
Which car has a higher maximum power output?
The Ford Ranger XLT 2.2 L4 MT has a max power of 120 PS @ 3700 rpm, while the Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT has a max power of 105 PS.
Which car is more fuel-efficient?
Unfortunately, this information isn't provided directly in the specs. However, considering the engine types and power outputs, it's likely that the Mitsubishi Xpander with its naturally aspirated engine might have better fuel efficiency than the turbocharged diesel Ford Ranger.
Is one of these cars more suitable for daily commuting?
The Ford Ranger seems to be a better fit for daily commuting due to its reliability and practicality. The Mitsubishi Xpander, while newer, has only 4 doors which might limit its suitability for families or those who need space for larger groups.
Which car comes with more exterior colors options?
The Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT offers three exterior color options: Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof, Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, and Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof. The Ford Ranger does not specify any exterior color options in the given data.