Foton Thunder 4×2 MT Dsl (2014) vs Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Foton Thunder 4×2 MT Dsl (2014) vs Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Foton Thunder 4×2 MT Dsl (2014) Foton ₱898,000 | Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) Mitsubishi ₱928,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2014 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Not available | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2776cc | 1590cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Naturally Aspirated, MIVEC |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 163 PS @ 3600 rpm | 117 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 360 Nm @ 1400 rpm | 154 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 11 : 1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Segment | Pickup | C |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 5310 | 4625 |
| Width (mm) | 1880 | 1760 |
| Height (mm) | 1870 | 1505 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3105 | 2635 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1860 | 1200 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 59 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring with Stabilizer Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Multi-Link |
| Front Wheels | 16x7.0" Alloys | 16x6.5 |
| Rear Wheels | 16x7.0" Alloys | 16x6.5 |
| Front Tires | 245/70/R16 | 205/60 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 245/70/R16 | 205/60 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | — | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | — | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Operation System |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen + Foglamps | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | Yes |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | — | Euro-4 |
Foton Thunder 4×2 MT Dsl (2014) vs Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the Foton Thunder 4×2 MT Dsl offers superior raw power and utility, making it ideal for heavy-duty hauling or commercial use, though it is currently unavailable. The Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT provides a more modern, available sedan option with better fuel economy and a unibody chassis, suitable for daily commuting. While the Foton is cheaper by ₱30,000, its 163 PS turbo-diesel engine outperforms the Lancer's 117 PS naturally aspirated gas engine. The Lancer wins on availability, emission compliance (Euro-4), and passenger comfort, whereas the Foton excels in torque (360 Nm vs 154 Nm) and seating capacity (5 vs 4). Choose the Foton for work and the Lancer for city driving or resale value.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Foton Thunder is ₱30,000 cheaper at ₱898,000 compared to the Mitsubishi Lancer EX at ₱928,000.
Which engine is more powerful?
The Foton Thunder's 2.77L turbo-diesel engine produces 163 PS, significantly more than the Lancer EX's 1.59L naturally aspirated engine which makes 117 PS.
Which car is better for daily commuting in Metro Manila?
The Mitsubishi Lancer EX is better for daily commuting due to its Euro-4 emission standard, unibody construction, and current availability, whereas the Foton is not available.
What is the difference in seating capacity?
The Foton Thunder seats 5 people (2+3), while the Mitsubishi Lancer EX is a 4-door sedan seating only 4 people.