Toyota Previa 2.4 Standard AT (White Pearl) (2014) vs BYD Tang DM-i (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Previa 2.4 Standard AT (White Pearl) (2014) vs BYD Tang DM-i (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Previa 2.4 Standard AT (White Pearl) (2014) Toyota ₱2,468,000 | BYD Tang DM-i (2026) BYD ₱2,148,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2014 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 6 years or 150,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2362cc | 1498cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, VVT-I | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | PHEV |
| Max Power | 170 PS @ 6000 rpm | 271 PS |
| Max Torque | 224 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 315 Nm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | Automatic 6-Speed |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Van | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | M | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4795 | 4870 |
| Width (mm) | 1800 | 1950 |
| Height (mm) | 1730 | 1720 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2950 | 2820 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1775 | 2130 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Moonstone Grey, Pearl White, and Silver Sand Black |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 53 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.5" Alloys | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.5" Alloys | 20 |
| Front Tires | 215/55 R17 | 255/55R20 |
| Rear Tires | 215/55 R17 | 255/55R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Ventilated Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Solid Disc |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | EPS |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Foot brake | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry & Alarm | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 12 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Toyota Previa 2.4 Standard AT (White Pearl) (2014) vs BYD Tang DM-i (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, power, and practicality, the BYD Tang DM‑i emerges as the more compelling choice. Priced at ₱2,148,000 versus the Toyota Previa’s ₱2,468,000, it offers a 320‑kilo‑dollar savings while delivering significantly higher performance: 271 PS and 315 Nm of torque compared to the Previa’s 170 PS and 224 Nm. The Tang’s plug‑in hybrid powertrain also provides a modern fuel‑efficient option, whereas the Previa relies on a conventional gasoline engine. In terms of daily usability, the Tang’s 2+3+2 seating layout and five‑door configuration make it better suited for families or commuters needing flexible passenger capacity. The Previa’s 2+2+3 layout and older 4‑speed automatic may feel less comfortable for larger groups. Both vehicles share a unibody construction and front‑wheel drive, but the Tang’s newer 2026 model benefits from a longer warranty of six years or 150,000 km compared to the Previa’s 3‑year/100,000 km guarantee. While the Previa is discontinued and may be harder to source parts for, the Tang’s current production status ensures easier maintenance and availability of accessories. Overall, if you prioritize lower purchase cost, higher power output, modern hybrid technology, and a more family‑friendly seating arrangement, the BYD Tang DM‑i is the better fit for most Filipino buyers.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The BYD Tang DM‑i costs ₱2,148,000, while the Toyota Previa is priced at ₱2,468,000, making the Tang cheaper by ₱320,000.
Which has more power and torque?
The Tang delivers 271 PS and 315 Nm, whereas the Previa offers 170 PS and 224 Nm.
Which is better for family use?
The Tang’s 2+3+2 seating and five doors provide more flexibility for families compared to the Previa’s 2+2+3 layout.
Which has a longer warranty?
The Tang offers 6 years or 150,000 km, while the Previa’s warranty is only 3 years or 100,000 km.