Toyota Vios 1.3 E AT (2014) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Toyota Vios 1.3 E AT (2014) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Toyota Vios 1.3 E AT (2014) Toyota ₱778,000 | Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) Toyota ₱841,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2014 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1299cc | 1329cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 86 PS @ 6000 rpm | 99 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 122 Nm @ 4400 rpm | 123 Nm @ 4400 rpm |
| Transmission | 4-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Segment | B | B |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4410 | 4410 |
| Width (mm) | 1700 | 1700 |
| Height (mm) | 1475 | 1475 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2550 | 2550 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 42 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 15" Alloys | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 15" Alloys | 15 |
| Front Tires | 185/60 R15 | 185/60 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 185/60 R15 | 185/60 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Type | — | Power |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Toyota Vios 1.3 E AT (2014) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost against performance, the 2014 Toyota Vios 1.3 E AT is the more economical choice at ₱778,000, offering a 4‑speed automatic that keeps running costs lower. However, the newer 2016 Vios 1.3 E CVT commands a higher price of ₱841,000 but delivers 13 PS more power (99 PS vs. 86 PS) and a slightly larger displacement of 1329cc, which translates to smoother acceleration and better fuel‑economy under continuous load thanks to the CVT’s ability to keep the engine in its optimal RPM band. Both models share identical body style, FWD layout, and seating for five, so interior space is unchanged. The 2016 model also benefits from a newer engine and a more modern transmission, potentially offering better long‑term reliability and resale value. If budget is the primary concern and you are comfortable with a 4‑speed automatic, the 2014 AT is suitable. If you prioritize performance and future resale, the 2016 CVT justifies its higher price.
The 2014 version is discontinued, so availability may be limited to used markets, whereas the 2016 model remains in production and easier to source parts. Warranty terms are identical (100 000 km/3‑years). In summary, choose the 2014 AT for lower upfront cost and the 2016 CVT for better power, newer technology, and continued availability.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The 2014 Toyota Vios 1.3 E AT costs ₱778,000, while the 2016 Vios 1.3 E CVT costs ₱841,000.
Which model has more power?
The 2016 CVT version produces 99 PS, whereas the 2014 AT version produces 86 PS.
Which model is better for daily commuting?
The CVT’s smoother gear changes and higher power make it more suitable for daily commuting, though both models share the same FWD layout and seating capacity.
Is the 2014 model still available?
The 2014 model is discontinued, so it can only be found in the used‑car market.