Audi A7 3.0 V6 AT (2015) vs Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Audi A7 3.0 V6 AT (2015) vs Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Audi A7 3.0 V6 AT (2015) Audi ₱6,630,000 | Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026) Hyundai ₱3,698,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 5-years/200,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 2995cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-valve | — |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 310 PS @ 5250-6500 rpm | 229 PS |
| Max Torque | 440 Nm @ 2900-4500 rpm | 350 Nm |
| Transmission | 7-Speed AT | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 5.6 secs | — |
| Top Speed | 250 km/h | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | 26.2 (10.8) | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | 42.8 (6.6) | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 34.4 (8.2) | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | E | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4969 | 4655 |
| Width (mm) | 1911 | 1800 |
| Height (mm) | 1420 | 1605 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2914 | 3000 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1785 | 2005 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Lucid Blue, Abyss Black, Atlas White, Cyber Gray, Digital Teal, Gravity Gold, Matte Gold, Shooting Star Matte Gray |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Trapezoidal Link, Programmable | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Five-Link, Programmable | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 19x8.0" Alloys | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 19x8.0" Alloys | 20 |
| Front Tires | 255/40 R19 | 255/45R20 |
| Rear Tires | 255/40 R19 | 255/45R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | Height adjust | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Comfort Access Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | — |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 8 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Audi A7 3.0 V6 AT (2015) vs Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing luxury performance against modern practicality, the choice hinges on budget, driving habits, and lifestyle. The 2015 Audi A7 3.0 V6 AT delivers a powerful 310 PS V6, all‑wheel drive, and a sporty 0‑100 km/h time of 5.6 seconds, appealing to enthusiasts who value performance and a premium sedan feel. However, it comes at a steep ₱6.63 million price, limited warranty (2 years unlimited), and is discontinued, meaning parts and service may be harder to source. Fuel consumption is relatively high, with a combined 34.4 L/100 km (≈8.2 km/L), which can strain daily commuting budgets. In contrast, the 2026 Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range costs ₱3.698 million—about half the Audi—and offers a 5‑year/200,000 km warranty, reflecting confidence in its electric drivetrain. Its 229 PS motor provides ample city acceleration, while the electric powertrain yields zero fuel cost and lower operating expenses, though exact range isn’t listed. The IONIQ 5’s midsize crossover SUV body, 5 doors, and flexible 2+3 seating suit families and urban parking. Its RWD layout and unibody construction give a comfortable ride, but it lacks the raw power and AWD grip of the Audi. Choose the Audi if you prioritize high‑performance luxury and can absorb higher purchase and running costs; opt for the IONIQ 5 if you want a more affordable, future‑proof, low‑running‑cost vehicle suited for daily use and family practicality.
Frequently asked questions
Which model is cheaper?
The Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range is priced at ₱3,698,000, roughly half the Audi A7’s ₱6,630,000 price.
Which vehicle offers more power?
The Audi A7 3.0 V6 AT produces 310 PS, while the Hyundai IONIQ 5 provides 229 PS, making the Audi the more powerful option.
What are the warranty differences?
Audi offers a 2‑year unlimited warranty, whereas Hyundai provides a longer 5‑year or 200,000 km warranty for the IONIQ 5.
Which car is more practical for daily commuting in the Philippines?
The IONIQ 5, with its lower price, electric drivetrain, 5‑door crossover body, and 2+3 seating, is more practical for everyday use and family needs, while the Audi’s higher fuel consumption and limited warranty make it less suited for daily commuting.