Audi RS 4 4.2 Avant V8 AT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Audi RS 4 4.2 Avant V8 AT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Audi RS 4 4.2 Avant V8 AT (2015) Audi | Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015) Suzuki ₱712,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V8 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 4163cc | 1373cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 32-valve | DOHC 16-valve with VVT |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 450 PS @ 8250 rpm | 98 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 430 Nm @ 4000-6000 rpm | 130 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 7-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 4.7 secs | — |
| Top Speed | 250 km/h | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | 19.3 (14.6) | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | 33.2 (8.5) | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 26.4 (10.7) | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Wagon | MPV |
| Segment | D | M |
| Construction | Unibody | Body On Frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 0 | 4265 |
| Width (mm) | 0 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 0 | 1685 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 0 | 2740 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1795 | 1180 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | electronic |
| Steering Column | Height adjust | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Suspension | — | MacPherson with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | — | Torsion Beam w/ Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | — | 15 Alloy |
| Rear Wheels | — | 15 Alloy |
| Front Tires | — | 185/65 R15 |
| Rear Tires | — | 185/65 R15 |
| Front Brakes | — | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | — | Disc |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Air Conditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Seat Material | — | Fabric |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4-Speakers |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Audi RS 4 4.2 Avant V8 AT (2015) vs Suzuki Ertiga GL (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a high-performance sedan with advanced features and capabilities, the Audi RS 4 Avant V8 is clearly superior to the Suzuki Ertiga GL. The Audi offers significantly more power and torque, better fuel economy, faster acceleration, and higher top speed. It's ideal for those who prioritize performance and luxury over practicality. On the other hand, the Suzuki Ertiga GL is a good choice if you're looking for a reliable, spacious MPV with adequate power and features at a much lower price point. The Ertiga is perfect for families or individuals needing a versatile vehicle that can handle daily commuting easily.
Frequently asked questions
Which car has more power?
The Audi RS 4 Avant V8 has significantly more power than the Suzuki Ertiga GL, with 450 PS compared to 98 PS.
Which car is better for daily commuting?
The Suzuki Ertiga GL is a better choice for daily commuting due to its lower price and adequate power. It's also a FWD vehicle which can handle urban driving conditions better than the AWD Audi RS 4 Avant V8.
Which car has better fuel economy?
The Suzuki Ertiga GL offers better fuel economy, with city mileage of 19.3 L/100km and highway mileage of 33.2 L/100km compared to the Audi RS 4 Avant V8 which has combined mileage of 26.4 L/100km.
Which car is more spacious?
The Suzuki Ertiga GL offers better interior space, being an MPV with seating capacity for up to 7 passengers and a length of 4265mm, compared to the Audi RS 4 Avant V8 which is a Wagon but does not provide specific passenger or cargo volume details.