Audi S3 2.0 TFSI quattro (2015) vs Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Audi S3 2.0 TFSI quattro (2015) vs Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Audi S3 2.0 TFSI quattro (2015) Audi ₱4,500,000 | Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026) Hyundai ₱4,580,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | Unlimited/2-years | 5-years/200,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 1984cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | — |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 290 PS @ 3500-6200 rpm | 304 PS |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1800-5500 rpm | 608 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed DCT | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | 5.2 seconds | — |
| Top Speed | 249 km/h | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | C | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4466 | 5060 |
| Width (mm) | 1796 | 1980 |
| Height (mm) | 1392 | 1790 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2631 | 3130 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1470 | 2505 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 55 | — |
| Exterior Colors | — | Serenity White, Abyss Black, Biophilic Blue, Nocturne Grey, Ionosphere Green, Celadon Grey |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | McPherson struts with lower wishbones, aluminum subframe, tubular anti-roll bar | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Four-link rear suspension with separate spring/shock absorber arrangement, subframe, tubular anti-roll bar | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 19" alloy | 21 |
| Rear Wheels | 19" alloy | 21 |
| Front Tires | 235/35 R19 | 285/45R21 |
| Rear Tires | 235/35 R19 | 285/45R21 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | Electromechanical | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Differential Lock | Yes | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | Yes | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-Zone Auto Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Electric | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 12 | 14 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | No | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Bi-Xenon | LED |
| Fog Lights | No | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Audi S3 2.0 TFSI quattro (2015) vs Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing performance, practicality and future‑proofing, the Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range edges ahead in several key areas. It is only ₱80,000 more expensive than the Audi S3 2.0 TFSI quattro yet offers a substantially higher power output (304 PS vs. 290 PS) and torque (608 Nm vs. 380 Nm), thanks to its electric motor. The IONIQ’s all‑electric drivetrain eliminates fuel costs and provides instant torque, making it ideal for city commuting and long‑range trips with zero emissions. Its generous 2+2+3 seating layout, five doors and large dimensions (5060 mm long, 1980 mm wide) give it a practical crossover feel that the compact sedan Audi cannot match. The IONIQ also boasts a longer warranty (5 years/200,000 km) compared to the Audi’s unlimited/2‑year offer, and its modern unibody construction aligns with current safety standards. If a buyer prioritizes power, electric efficiency, interior space and a longer warranty, the IONIQ 9 is the clear choice. Conversely, if a buyer values traditional driving dynamics, a lower price point and a more compact sedan footprint, the Audi S3 remains an attractive option.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Audi S3 2.0 TFSI quattro costs ₱4,500,000 while the Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range is ₱4,580,000, making the Audi cheaper by ₱80,000.
Which has more power and torque?
The IONIQ 9 provides 304 PS and 608 Nm, whereas the Audi offers 290 PS and 380 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting in the Philippines?
The IONIQ 9’s electric motor delivers instant torque, zero fuel costs and a long‑range capability that suits urban commuting, while the Audi’s gasoline engine requires regular fuel.
What are the seating and space differences?
The IONIQ 9 seats up to 7 with a 2+2+3 layout and measures 5060 mm long, whereas the Audi S3 is a compact sedan with no specified seating capacity beyond typical two‑row layout.