BAIC A1 Hatchback Comfort 1.3 (2015) vs Suzuki Carry 1.5 Cargo Van (2020)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of BAIC A1 Hatchback Comfort 1.3 (2015) vs Suzuki Carry 1.5 Cargo Van (2020) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | BAIC A1 Hatchback Comfort 1.3 (2015) Baic ₱648,000 | Suzuki Carry 1.5 Cargo Van (2020) Suzuki ₱699,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2020 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1299 | 1462cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 99 PS | 96 PS @ 3500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 124 Nm | 135 Nm @ 4400 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
| Segment | B | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 3998 | 4195 |
| Width (mm) | 1720 | 1765 |
| Height (mm) | 1500 | 1910 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2500 | 2205 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1090 | 1065 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 45 | 43 |
| Exterior Colors | — | White |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | H-Type Torsion Beam | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 14 Steel Rim | 13 |
| Rear Wheels | 14 Steel Rim | 13 |
| Front Tires | 175/65 R14 | 165/80/R13 |
| Rear Tires | 175/65 R14 | 165/80/R13 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | Collapsible w/ Tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Manual Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Vinyl |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4-Speakers | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Projector Type | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
BAIC A1 Hatchback Comfort 1.3 (2015) vs Suzuki Carry 1.5 Cargo Van (2020): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the BAIC A1 Hatchback (₱648,000) is the better choice if you primarily need a daily commuter or family car. It's cheaper, more powerful (99 PS vs 96 PS), has a 5-door hatchback body with seating for five, and uses a unibody construction for car-like handling. The Suzuki Carry Cargo Van (₱699,000) is better suited for businesses or those who prioritize cargo capacity. It has a body-on-frame chassis, RWD, and higher torque (135 Nm vs 124 Nm) for hauling loads. However, it's a 2-door van with less passenger space (likely only 2 seats) and costs more. The BAIC offers better value for everyday commuting and passenger transport, while the Suzuki excels in utility. Consider your primary use: BAIC for people, Suzuki for goods.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper between BAIC A1 and Suzuki Carry?
The BAIC A1 Hatchback is cheaper at ₱648,000 compared to the Suzuki Carry Cargo Van at ₱699,000.
Which vehicle is more powerful?
The BAIC A1 has 99 PS, slightly more than the Suzuki Carry's 96 PS. However, the Suzuki has higher torque (135 Nm vs 124 Nm), which is better for hauling.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The BAIC A1 is better for daily commuting due to its 5-door hatchback design, seating for five, and unibody construction that offers car-like ride comfort.
Which is better for cargo or business use?
The Suzuki Carry Cargo Van is better for cargo with its body-on-frame chassis, RWD, higher torque (135 Nm), and van body designed for hauling goods.