BAIC A1 Hatchback Comfort 1.3 (2015) vs Suzuki Carry 1.5 Utility Van (2020)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of BAIC A1 Hatchback Comfort 1.3 (2015) vs Suzuki Carry 1.5 Utility Van (2020) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | BAIC A1 Hatchback Comfort 1.3 (2015) Baic ₱648,000 | Suzuki Carry 1.5 Utility Van (2020) Suzuki ₱739,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2020 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1299 | 1462cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 99 PS | 96 PS @ 3500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 124 Nm | 135 Nm @ 4400 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10:1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
| Segment | B | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 3998 | 4195 |
| Width (mm) | 1720 | 1765 |
| Height (mm) | 1500 | 1910 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2500 | 2205 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1090 | 1065 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 45 | 43 |
| Exterior Colors | — | White |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | H-Type Torsion Beam | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 14 Steel Rim | 13 |
| Rear Wheels | 14 Steel Rim | 13 |
| Front Tires | 175/65 R14 | 165/80/R13 |
| Rear Tires | 175/65 R14 | 165/80/R13 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | Collapsible w/ Tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Manual Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Vinyl |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4-Speakers | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Projector Type | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | No | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
BAIC A1 Hatchback Comfort 1.3 (2015) vs Suzuki Carry 1.5 Utility Van (2020): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the BAIC A1 Hatchback (₱648,000) and Suzuki Carry Utility Van (₱739,000) depends on intended use. The BAIC A1 is more affordable and practical for daily commuting with its hatchback body, 5 doors, and 5-seat capacity, making it ideal for families or urban driving. Its FWD and unibody construction offer car-like handling and comfort. The Suzuki Carry, though pricier, excels as a utility vehicle with RWD and body-on-frame construction for durability, higher torque (135 Nm at 4400 rpm) for carrying loads, and a van body suited for cargo or business. However, it only has 2 doors and lacks seating details, limiting passenger capacity. Power outputs are similar (99 PS vs 96 PS). The BAIC is newer in terms of model year? Actually BAIC is 2015, Suzuki 2020, so Suzuki is newer but not necessarily better. For pure value and daily use, the BAIC A1 wins; for heavy-duty utility, the Suzuki Carry is better. Warranty is identical.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The BAIC A1 Hatchback is cheaper at ₱648,000 compared to the Suzuki Carry at ₱739,000.
Which has more power?
The BAIC A1 has a higher peak power of 99 PS, while the Suzuki Carry produces 96 PS. However, the Suzuki has higher torque (135 Nm vs 124 Nm), which benefits load-carrying ability.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The BAIC A1 is better for daily commuting due to its hatchback body, 5 doors, and 5-seat capacity, offering passenger comfort and maneuverability.
Which is better for cargo and business use?
The Suzuki Carry is better for cargo or business with its RWD, body-on-frame construction, higher torque, and van body style designed for utility.