BYD L3 GS-i 1.5 MT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of BYD L3 GS-i 1.5 MT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification BYD L3 GS-i 1.5 MT (2015) BYD ₱788,000 Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) Toyota ₱841,000
Overview
Model Year 2015 2016
Warranty 100,000km/3-years 100,000km/3-years
Availability Current Current
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Inline-4
Displacement 1488cc 1329cc
Valvetrain SOHC 16-valve DOHC 16-valve
Aspiration Naturally aspirated Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type Gas Gas
Max Power 107 hp @ 5800 rpm 99 PS @ 6000 rpm
Max Torque 144 Nm @ 4800 rpm 123 Nm @ 4400 rpm
Transmission 5-Speed M/T CVT
Drivetrain FWD FWD
Body & Dimensions
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Segment C B
Construction Unibody Unibody
Doors 4 4
Seating Capacity 2+3 2+3
Length (mm) 4568 4410
Width (mm) 1716 1700
Height (mm) 1480 1475
Wheelbase (mm) 2615 2550
Curb Weight (kg) 1210
Fuel Tank (L) 42
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension MacPherson MacPherson
Rear Suspension Torsion beam Torsion Beam
Front Wheels 15" Alloys 15
Rear Wheels 15" Alloys 15
Front Tires 195/60 R15 185/60 R15
Rear Tires 195/60 R15 185/60 R15
Front Brakes Disc Disc
Rear Brakes Disc Drum
Steering Type Hydraulic Power
Steering Column tilt Tilt
Tire Pressure Monitoring No No
Differential Lock No No
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) Yes Yes
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution Yes Yes
Brake Assist No Yes
Parking Sensors No No
Stability Control No No
Traction Control No No
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist No No
Hill Descent Control No No
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag No Yes
Knee Airbag No No
Passenger Airbag No Yes
Front Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Curtain Airbags No No
Rear Side Airbags No No
Door Locking Central Locking Central Locking
Engine Immobilizer No
Security Alarm Yes
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Manual Manual
Rear A/C Vents No Yes
Seat Material Fabric/Leather Fabric
Parking Brake Manual Manual
Key Type Comfort Access Smart Key Keyless Entry
Push-Button Start No No
Cruise Control No No
Multi-Info Display No No
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera No No
Auto Headlights No No
Power Windows Yes Yes
Power Seats No No
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode No No
Antenna yes yes
Infotainment & Audio
Speakers 4-speakers 4
Touchscreen No Yes
Navigation No No
Bluetooth No Yes
Apple CarPlay No No
Android Auto No No
USB Yes Yes
AUX Input Yes Yes
AM/FM Radio Yes Yes
CD Player Yes Yes
DVD Player No No
MP3 Playback No Yes
iPod Support No Yes
SD Card Slot No No
Lighting
Headlights HID, LED Halogen
Fog Lights Yes
Daytime Running Lights No
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

BYD L3 GS-i 1.5 MT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016): which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer looking for the most economical option, the BYD L3 GS-i 1.5 MT offers a lower price of ₱788,000 compared to the Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT at ₱841,000. The BYD’s larger 1488cc engine delivers higher power (107 hp at 5800 rpm) and torque (144 Nm at 4800 rpm), giving it a performance edge over the Vios’s 1329cc engine (99 PS at 6000 rpm, 123 Nm at 4400 rpm). Both cars share similar body styles (sedan), drivetrain (FWD), and seating capacity (2+3) with 4 doors, so practicality is comparable. The BYD’s longer length (4568 mm vs 4410 mm) may offer slightly more interior space. If budget and power are priorities, choose the BYD; if a brand name or slightly lower purchase price is more important, the Toyota Vios remains a solid choice.

Frequently asked questions

Which car is cheaper?

The BYD L3 GS-i 1.5 MT costs ₱788,000, while the Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT is priced at ₱841,000.

Which vehicle has more power?

The BYD’s 107 hp engine outperforms the Vios’s 99 PS (approximately 97 hp) power output.

Which model offers better torque?

The BYD provides 144 Nm of torque, higher than the Vios’s 123 Nm.

Do both cars have similar practicality?

Both are 4‑door sedans with 2+3 seating, FWD drivetrain, and unibody construction, so practicality is comparable.