Chevrolet Camaro RS 3.6L Coupe V6 AT (2015) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Camaro RS 3.6L Coupe V6 AT (2015) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Camaro RS 3.6L Coupe V6 AT (2015) Chevrolet ₱3,218,888 | Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) Ford ₱3,499,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 3564cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-Valve | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Direct Injection | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 316 PS @ 6400 rpm | 394 PS |
| Max Torque | 377 Nm @ 5200 rpm | 676 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | S | SUV |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4840 | 4713 |
| Width (mm) | 1920 | 1881 |
| Height (mm) | 1380 | 1627 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 2984 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Shadow Black, Star White, Velocity Blue Metallic, Glacier Gray, Grabber Yellow |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2084 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 20x7.5" Alloys | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 20x7.5" Alloys | 19 |
| Front Tires | 245/45/R20 | 225/55R19 |
| Rear Tires | 245/45/R20 | 225/55R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 9 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | Yes |
Chevrolet Camaro RS 3.6L Coupe V6 AT (2015) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (₱3.5M) and Chevrolet Camaro RS (₱3.22M) cater to completely different needs. The Camaro is a discontinued 2015 V6 coupe (316 PS, 377 Nm) with rear-wheel drive and a 2+2 seating layout—ideal for enthusiasts seeking a classic muscle car experience and lower price. However, it lacks modern practicality and is no longer available new. The Mach-E (2026, current) is an electric AWD crossover (394 PS, 676 Nm) with five seats, five doors, and significantly higher torque, making it more practical for daily commuting, families, and all-weather driving. Its ₱280k premium buys modern tech, zero emissions, and SUV versatility. If you prioritize performance nostalgia and lower cost, the Camaro is the choice (if you can find one used). For most buyers—especially those wanting a practical, powerful daily driver with the latest EV advantages—the Mach-E is the clear winner. Its higher power, superior torque, and family-friendly SUV body suit the Philippines's traffic and road conditions better. Consider also the Camaro's discontinued status may affect parts and resale.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper: Chevrolet Camaro RS or Ford Mustang Mach-E?
The Chevrolet Camaro RS is cheaper at ₱3,218,888 compared to the Ford Mustang Mach-E at ₱3,499,000, a difference of about ₱280,112.
Which car has more power and torque?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E has more power with 394 PS (vs 316 PS) and significantly more torque at 676 Nm (vs 377 Nm), making it faster off the line.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is better for daily commuting due to its SUV body, five doors, higher seating capacity (5 vs 2+2), and electric powertrain with instant torque—more practical for traffic and passengers.
Which car has more seating capacity?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E seats 5 (2+3) while the Chevrolet Camaro RS seats only 2+2, so the Mach-E is better for families or carrying more passengers.