Chevrolet Camaro RS 3.6L Coupe V6 AT (2015) vs Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Camaro RS 3.6L Coupe V6 AT (2015) vs Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Camaro RS 3.6L Coupe V6 AT (2015) Chevrolet ₱3,218,888 | Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026) Hyundai ₱3,698,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5-years/200,000km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | V6 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 3564cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 24-Valve | — |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Direct Injection | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 316 PS @ 6400 rpm | 229 PS |
| Max Torque | 377 Nm @ 5200 rpm | 350 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Coupe | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | S | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4840 | 4655 |
| Width (mm) | 1920 | 1800 |
| Height (mm) | 1380 | 1605 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2850 | 3000 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Lucid Blue, Abyss Black, Atlas White, Cyber Gray, Digital Teal, Gravity Gold, Matte Gold, Shooting Star Matte Gray |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2005 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 20x7.5" Alloys | 20 |
| Rear Wheels | 20x7.5" Alloys | 20 |
| Front Tires | 245/45/R20 | 255/45R20 |
| Rear Tires | 245/45/R20 | 255/45R20 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | — |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 8 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | Yes |
Chevrolet Camaro RS 3.6L Coupe V6 AT (2015) vs Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing performance, practicality and future‑proofing, the Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range emerges as the more balanced choice. It costs ₱3,698,000 versus ₱3,218,888 for the Camaro, a difference of roughly ₱480,000. However, the IONIQ 5 offers a modern electric powertrain with 229 PS and 350 Nm torque, delivering instant acceleration and zero emissions—benefits that outweigh the Camaro’s 316 PS V6 in a country with rising fuel costs and limited charging infrastructure. The IONIQ 5’s 5‑door, 2+3 seating and 4655 mm length provide greater practicality for families or commuters, while the Camaro’s coupe body and 2+2 layout cater to a niche of enthusiasts seeking rear‑wheel drive sport dynamics. Warranty terms also favor the IONIQ 5: 5 years or 200,000 km versus the Camaro’s 3 years or 100,000 km. If a buyer prioritizes raw power and a classic sports coupe aesthetic, the Camaro remains an attractive option; otherwise, for everyday use, efficiency and space, the IONIQ 5 is recommended.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Chevrolet Camaro RS 3.6L Coupe costs ₱3,218,888, while the Hyundai IONIQ 5 GLS 2WD Long Range is priced at ₱3,698,000. The Camaro is cheaper by about ₱480,000.
Which has more power?
The Camaro’s V6 engine delivers 316 PS at 6400 rpm, whereas the IONIQ 5’s electric motor produces 229 PS. The Camaro has higher peak power.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The IONIQ 5 offers a 5‑door, 2+3 seating layout, electric drive with zero emissions, and a longer warranty (5 years/200,000 km), making it more practical for daily use. The Camaro’s 2‑door coupe and RWD sport orientation are less suited to everyday family commuting.
What about maintenance and fuel costs?
The Camaro requires gasoline and has a 3‑year/100,000 km warranty. The IONIQ 5 uses electric power, eliminates fuel costs, and comes with a 5‑year/200,000 km warranty, potentially lowering long‑term maintenance expenses.