Chevrolet Colorado 2.5L 4×2 LT MT Dsl (2015) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Colorado 2.5L 4×2 LT MT Dsl (2015) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Colorado 2.5L 4×2 LT MT Dsl (2015) Chevrolet ₱1,148,888 | Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,099,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2499cc | 1499cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-Valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler CRDI | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 150 PS @ 3800 rpm | 105 PS |
| Max Torque | 350 Nm @ 2000 rpm | 141 Nm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T, LSD | Manual 5-Speed |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | MPV AUV |
| Segment | Pickup | MPV |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5347 | 4595 |
| Width (mm) | 1870 | 1750 |
| Height (mm) | 1778 | 1750 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3095 | 2775 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1958 | 1260 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof. Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 45 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Axle | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 16x6.5" Alloys | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 16x6.5" Alloys | 17 |
| Front Tires | 245/70/R16 | 205/55R17 |
| Rear Tires | 245/70/R16 | 205/55R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Mechanical |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
Chevrolet Colorado 2.5L 4×2 LT MT Dsl (2015) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and practical pickup truck with good power-to-weight ratio, the Chevrolet Colorado stands out as a better choice. Its manual transmission, turbocharged diesel engine, and body-on-frame construction make it suitable for towing and hauling tasks. The Mitsubishi Xpander is more suited for daily commuting due to its smaller size and FWD setup, but lacks towing capacity.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle should I choose if I need a pickup truck that can handle towing and heavy loads?
The Chevrolet Colorado is the better choice here as it offers manual transmission, turbocharged diesel engine, and body-on-frame construction which are ideal for towing and hauling tasks.
Is the Mitsubishi Xpander more powerful than the Chevrolet Colorado?
No, the Mitsubishi Xpander has a naturally aspirated 1499cc inline-4 engine producing only 105 PS compared to the Chevrolet Colorado's turbocharged diesel engine with 150 PS.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting in terms of power and fuel efficiency?
The Mitsubishi Xpander, being naturally aspirated and having a smaller displacement, offers more power (105 PS) than the Chevrolet Colorado. However, it lacks towing capacity suitable for heavy loads or long hauls.
Which vehicle is cheaper between the two?
The Mitsubishi Xpander GLX MT is cheaper at ₱1,099,000 compared to the Chevrolet Colorado LT MT Dsl priced at ₱1,148,888.