Chevrolet Colorado 2.8L 4×2 AT LT (2015) vs Mitsubishi ASX GLS (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Colorado 2.8L 4×2 AT LT (2015) vs Mitsubishi ASX GLS (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Colorado 2.8L 4×2 AT LT (2015) Chevrolet ₱1,218,888 | Mitsubishi ASX GLS (2017) Mitsubishi ₱1,215,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000 km/5-years | 100,000 km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2776cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooler | Naturally Aspirated MIVEC |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 203 PS @ 3800 rpm | 150 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 500 Nm @ 2000 rpm | 197 Nm @ 4200 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Crossover |
| Segment | Pickup | J |
| Construction | Body-On-Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 5347 | 4295 |
| Width (mm) | 1882 | 1770 |
| Height (mm) | 1790 | 1625 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3096 | 2670 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1350 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 63 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Independent Short Long Arms with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Beam Axle with Leaf Spring | Multi-Link Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Front Wheels | 16'' Alloys | 17x6.5 |
| Rear Wheels | 16'' Alloys | 17x6.5 |
| Front Tires | 245/70 R16 | 215/60 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 245/70 R16 | 215/60 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | Electronic |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | tilt and telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Front Curtain Airbags | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | Yes |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | Yes |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | HID |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | — | Euro-4 |
Chevrolet Colorado 2.8L 4×2 AT LT (2015) vs Mitsubishi ASX GLS (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and capable vehicle with good power-to-weight ratio, the Chevrolet Colorado seems to be the better choice despite its discontinued status. It offers more torque at lower rpm, making it suitable for towing and off-road conditions. The Mitsubishi ASX is more suited for city driving due to its FWD setup and CVT transmission, but its Euro-4 emission standard makes it a cleaner option. For those who prioritize power and towing capacity, the Colorado is the way to go.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle has better fuel efficiency?
The data does not provide specific information about fuel efficiency for either vehicle.
Is one of these vehicles more powerful than the other?
Yes, the Chevrolet Colorado outperforms the Mitsubishi ASX with higher torque and power at lower RPMs, making it more suitable for towing and off-road conditions.
Which car is better suited for daily commuting?
The Mitsubishi ASX is better suited for city driving due to its FWD setup and CVT transmission, which can offer smoother acceleration and better fuel economy in urban settings.
Which vehicle has a longer warranty period?
Both vehicles have the same warranty period of 100,000 km/5-years or 3-years. However, the Chevrolet Colorado is discontinued, so it may not be available for purchase anymore.