Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LS MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LS MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LS MT (2015) Chevrolet ₱908,888 | Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) Mitsubishi ₱928,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1793cc | 1590cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, DVVTC | Naturally Aspirated, MIVEC |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 141 PS @ 6300 rpm | 117 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 175 Nm @ 3800 rpm | 154 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 11 : 1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Segment | C | C |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 4597 | 4625 |
| Width (mm) | 1788 | 1760 |
| Height (mm) | 1477 | 1505 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2685 | 2635 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1200 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 59 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring with Stabilizer Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Multi-Link |
| Front Wheels | 16x7.0" Alloys | 16x6.5 |
| Rear Wheels | 16x7.0" Alloys | 16x6.5 |
| Front Tires | 205/60/R16 | 205/60 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 205/60/R16 | 205/60 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Operation System |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | Yes |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | — | Euro-4 |
Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LS MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016): which should you buy?
For most Filipino buyers seeking a reliable and practical sedan with decent power, the Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LS MT is the better choice. It's slightly cheaper and offers more torque than the Mitsubishi Lancer EX.
Frequently asked questions
Which car has better fuel efficiency?
The data doesn't specify fuel consumption for both cars. However, the Chevrolet Cruze with its larger engine might offer a slight edge in power but not necessarily in fuel economy compared to the Mitsubishi.
Is one of these vehicles more reliable based on warranty information?
Both have the same 100,000km/3-years warranty, indicating similar levels of reliability. However, the Chevrolet Cruze is discontinued while the Mitsubishi Lancer EX is currently available.
Which car has a better resale value after a few years?
Based on current availability and popularity, the Mitsubishi Lancer EX might be more desirable for future resale as it's still in production and possibly more popular among buyers.
Which car is easier to maintain based on engine type and maintenance information provided?
Both cars use inline-4 engines with similar maintenance requirements. However, the Chevrolet Cruze has a discontinued status which may affect parts availability and cost for future maintenance.