Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLS 2.2L 4×4 MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLS 2.2L 4×4 MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (2015) Chevrolet ₱1,103,888 | Ford Ranger XLS 2.2L 4×4 MT (2015) Ford ₱1,199,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1793cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, DVVTC | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 141 PS @ 6300 rpm | 150 PS @ 3700 rpm |
| Max Torque | 175 Nm @ 3800 rpm | 375 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | 4WD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Pick Up |
| Segment | C | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Unibody | Body On Frame |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4597 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1788 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1477 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2685 | 3220 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.0" Alloys | 16'' Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.0" Alloys | 16'' Alloys |
| Front Tires | 215/50/R17 | 255/70 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 215/50/R17 | 255/70 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Single Zone Automatic |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLS 2.2L 4×4 MT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer prioritizing daily commuter comfort and fuel economy, the Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT is the superior choice. It offers a lower price of ₱1,103,888 compared to the Ford Ranger's ₱1,199,000, while delivering smoother power delivery via its 6-Speed A/T versus the manual transmission. The Cruze's naturally aspirated 1.8L engine provides adequate performance for city driving, whereas the Ford Ranger's turbocharged 2.2L diesel is significantly more expensive and overpowered, making it ideal only for those needing heavy-duty 4WD capability and a body-on-frame chassis for off-road or heavy load scenarios.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT is cheaper at ₱1,103,888 compared to the Ford Ranger XLS 2.2L 4x4 MT which costs ₱1,199,000.
Which engine is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger XLS 2.2L 4x4 MT is more powerful with 150 PS versus the Chevrolet Cruze's 141 PS. However, the Ranger produces significantly more torque at 375 Nm compared to the Cruze's 175 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting in Manila?
The Chevrolet Cruze is better for daily commuting due to its lower price, 6-Speed A/T transmission, and fuel-efficient naturally aspirated 1.8L engine designed for the C-segment sedan segment.
Which vehicle is discontinued?
The Ford Ranger XLS 2.2L 4x4 MT is discontinued, while the Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT remains available.