Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (2015) Chevrolet ₱1,103,888 | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) Ford ₱1,219,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Discontinued |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1793cc | 2198cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, DVVTC | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 141 PS @ 6300 rpm | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm |
| Max Torque | 175 Nm @ 3800 rpm | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Pick Up |
| Segment | C | Pick-Up |
| Construction | Unibody | Body On Frame |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4597 | 5277 |
| Width (mm) | 1788 | 2163 |
| Height (mm) | 1477 | 1821 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2685 | 3220 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 80 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.0" Alloys | 17" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.0" Alloys | 17" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 215/50/R17 | 265/65 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 215/50/R17 | 265/65 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | Yes |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Single Zone Automatic |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (2015) vs Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the choice between the Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (2015) and the Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 MT (2017) hinges on your primary use. If you need a daily commuter with a comfortable sedan ride and automatic transmission for city driving, the Cruze is the better pick. It costs ₱1,103,888—over ₱115,000 cheaper than the Ranger—and is still available new, with a 3-year warranty. Its 1.8L gas engine (141 PS, 175 Nm) paired with a 6-speed automatic is ideal for urban roads, and its unibody construction offers car-like handling. However, if you require a workhorse for heavy payloads or off-road capability, the Ranger justifies its higher price of ₱1,219,000. It produces 160 PS and a massive 385 Nm of torque from its turbo diesel, giving it superior towing and hauling ability. Its body-on-frame design and 5.3-meter length are better for cargo, but the manual transmission and RWD setup make it less convenient in traffic. Note that the Ranger is discontinued, so you'll be looking at used units. Overall, the Cruze wins for comfort and economy, while the Ranger wins for utility and power.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Chevrolet Cruze is cheaper at ₱1,103,888, while the Ford Ranger costs ₱1,219,000.
Which has more horsepower?
The Ford Ranger has more power with 160 PS, compared to the Cruze's 141 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Chevrolet Cruze is better for daily commuting due to its automatic transmission, car-like unibody ride, and lower price.
Which is more practical for cargo?
The Ford Ranger is more practical for cargo with its pick-up bed and body-on-frame construction, offering higher payload and towing capacity.