Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (2015) vs Nissan Almera 1.0 VE Turbo CVT with NCS (2024)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (2015) vs Nissan Almera 1.0 VE Turbo CVT with NCS (2024) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (2015) Chevrolet ₱1,103,888 | Nissan Almera 1.0 VE Turbo CVT with NCS (2024) Nissan ₱1,099,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2024 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-3 |
| Displacement | 1793cc | 999cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 12-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, DVVTC | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 141 PS @ 6300 rpm | 100 PS @ 5000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 175 Nm @ 3800 rpm | 152 Nm @ 2400 - 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Family Sedan |
| Segment | C | Sedan |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4597 | 4495 |
| Width (mm) | 1788 | 1740 |
| Height (mm) | 1477 | 1460 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2685 | 2620 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Brilliant Silver, Pearl White, Moon Pearl Grey, Galaxy Black, Gun Metallic, Cayenne Red |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1103 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 35 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.0" Alloys | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.0" Alloys | 15 |
| Front Tires | 215/50/R17 | 195/55/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 215/50/R17 | 195/55/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt + Telescopic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | Yes |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | Yes |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | Yes |
Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (2015) vs Nissan Almera 1.0 VE Turbo CVT with NCS (2024): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and practical sedan with decent power and good fuel efficiency, the Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT is a better choice. It offers more torque and slightly higher max power than the Nissan Almera, making it suitable for daily commuting and handling heavier loads. The Cruze also has a longer warranty period of 3 years/100,000km compared to the Almera's 3 years/100,000km. Despite the slightly higher price, the Chevrolet Cruze is more cost-effective in the long run.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper between Chevrolet Cruze and Nissan Almera?
The Nissan Almera is cheaper at ₱1,099,000 compared to the Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT priced at ₱1,103,888.
Which vehicle has better fuel efficiency?
Both vehicles have similar fuel types (gasoline) and transmission types (CVT for Almera, A/T for Cruze), but the Nissan Almera with a turbocharged engine might offer slightly better performance in terms of power output per liter of fuel consumed.
Which vehicle is more suitable for daily commuting?
The Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT is more suitable for daily commuting due to its higher torque and max power, making it easier to handle heavier loads and start from a stop.
Which vehicle has a longer warranty period?
The Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT comes with a warranty of 3 years/100,000km compared to the Nissan Almera's 3 years/100,000km, providing more peace of mind for the buyer.