Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (2015) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Aluminum Cargo DSL M/T (2025)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (2015) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Aluminum Cargo DSL M/T (2025) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (2015) Chevrolet ₱1,103,888 | Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Aluminum Cargo DSL M/T (2025) Toyota ₱1,041,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2025 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3 years or 100,000 kms |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1793cc | 2393cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, DVVTC | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 141 PS @ 6300 rpm | 150 PS @ 3400 rpm |
| Max Torque | 175 Nm @ 3800 rpm | 343 Nm @ 2800 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Manual |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Van |
| Segment | C | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 4597 | 5300 |
| Width (mm) | 1788 | 1795 |
| Height (mm) | 1477 | 2180 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2685 | 3085 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Super white II, Silver metallic 1, Black |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1775 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 55 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | IFS Coil |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Leaf spring with shock absorber |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.0" Alloys | 14 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.0" Alloys | 14 |
| Front Tires | 215/50/R17 | 195R14C |
| Rear Tires | 215/50/R17 | 195R14C |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | — |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Automatic Climate Control | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | PVC |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Mechanical |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | — |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 2 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT (2015) vs Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Aluminum Cargo DSL M/T (2025): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and practical sedan with decent power output, the Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT is the better choice. It offers more passenger space and has a longer warranty compared to the Toyota Tamaraw. The Cruze's naturally aspirated engine provides good performance without the need for regular maintenance of a turbocharged diesel engine. For those who prioritize practicality over power, the Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT is recommended.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle has better fuel efficiency?
The data provided does not specify fuel efficiency figures. However, both vehicles use different types of fuels (gasoline vs. diesel). The Cruze's naturally aspirated engine might offer a slight edge in terms of economy compared to the Tamaraw's turbocharged diesel setup.
Which vehicle is more powerful?
The Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Aluminum Cargo DSL M/T has a higher maximum power output at 150 PS, while the Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT produces 141 PS. This makes the Tamaraw slightly more powerful.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
The Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT offers a longer warranty (3 years/100,000 km) compared to the Toyota Tamaraw's shorter warranty of only 3 years or 100,000 km. Additionally, its naturally aspirated engine might be more fuel-efficient for daily driving.
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 LT AT has a lower price tag at ₱1,103,888 compared to the Toyota Tamaraw 2.4 Aluminum Cargo DSL M/T which costs ₱1,041,000.