Ford Ecosport 1.5 Ambiente MT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ecosport 1.5 Ambiente MT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ecosport 1.5 Ambiente MT (2015) Ford ₱848,000 | Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) Toyota ₱841,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 1329cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Ti-VCT | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 110 PS @ 6300 rpm | 99 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 142 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 123 Nm @ 4400 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Segment | J | B |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4245 | 4410 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1700 |
| Height (mm) | 1708 | 1475 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2521 | 2550 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 42 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring, Anti-roll Bar | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Twist Beam w/ Twin Gas, Oil Filled Shock Absorber | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 15 | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 15 | 15 |
| Front Tires | 192/65 R15 | 185/60 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 192/65 R15 | 185/60 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Power |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Cloth | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ecosport 1.5 Ambiente MT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016): which should you buy?
The Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (₱841,000) is the better value for most Filipino daily commuters. It is cheaper than the Ford Ecosport 1.5 Ambiente MT (₱848,000) and delivers significantly more torque (123 Nm vs 142 Nm) for a smaller engine (1329cc vs 1498cc). While both have 5-door hatchback layouts with 2+3 seating, the Vios’ front-wheel-drive layout and smaller footprint make it easier to maneuver in Manila traffic. The Ford’s rear-wheel-drive configuration and higher power output (110 PS vs 99 PS) are less relevant for typical city driving, though the Ford offers a slightly longer cabin (4245mm vs 4410mm). Both models share a 100,000km/3-year warranty, so long-term reliability is comparable. Choose the Vios if cost and practicality are top priorities; opt for the Ford if you value higher power for occasional highway use.