Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) Ford ₱958,000 | Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) Mitsubishi ₱928,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 1590cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Ti-VCT | Naturally Aspirated, MIVEC |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 110 PS @ 6300 rpm | 117 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 142 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 154 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 11 : 1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Segment | J | C |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 4245 | 4625 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1760 |
| Height (mm) | 1708 | 1505 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2521 | 2635 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1200 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 59 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring, Anti-roll Bar | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring with Stabilizer Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Twist Beam w/ Twin Gas, Oil Filled Shock Absorber | Multi-Link |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 16x6.5 |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 16x6.5 |
| Front Tires | 205/60 R16 | 205/60 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 205/60 R16 | 205/60 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Cloth | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Operation System |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | — | Euro-4 |
Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a compact SUV with good value and practicality, the Ford Ecosport stands out as a solid choice. It offers better power output at 110 PS compared to the Mitsubishi Lancer's 117 PS, which can be crucial in urban driving conditions. The Ecosport also has more doors (5 vs 4), making it suitable for families or those who need additional passenger space. Additionally, its RWD setup is better suited for handling city traffic and parking. For a daily commute, the Ford Ecosport's 1.5L engine provides sufficient power to handle urban driving needs without being overly noisy.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper between the Ford Ecosport and Mitsubishi Lancer?
The Ford Ecosport is cheaper at ₱958,000 compared to the Mitsubishi Lancer EX at ₱928,000.
What's the difference in power output between the two vehicles?
The Ford Ecosport has a higher maximum power of 110 PS compared to the Mitsubishi Lancer EX which produces 117 PS.
Which car is better for daily commuting?
The Ford Ecosport is generally better suited for daily commuting due to its RWD setup, which provides better handling and parking ease in city traffic.
Does one vehicle have more doors than the other?
Yes, the Ford Ecosport has 5 doors while the Mitsubishi Lancer EX has only 4.