Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend MT (2015) Ford ₱908,000 | Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016) Mitsubishi ₱928,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1498cc | 1590cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Ti-VCT | Naturally Aspirated, MIVEC |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 110 PS @ 6300 rpm | 117 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 142 Nm @ 4500 rpm | 154 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 11 : 1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Segment | J | C |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 4245 | 4625 |
| Width (mm) | 1765 | 1760 |
| Height (mm) | 1708 | 1505 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2521 | 2635 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1200 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 59 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Coil Spring, Anti-roll Bar | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring with Stabilizer Bar |
| Rear Suspension | Twist Beam w/ Twin Gas, Oil Filled Shock Absorber | Multi-Link |
| Front Wheels | 16 | 16x6.5 |
| Rear Wheels | 16 | 16x6.5 |
| Front Tires | 205/60 R16 | 205/60 R16 |
| Rear Tires | 205/60 R16 | 205/60 R16 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Cloth | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Operation System |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | — | Euro-4 |
Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer prioritizing budget and resale value, the Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend MT is the logical choice, sitting ₱20,000 cheaper than the Mitsubishi Lancer EX. While the Lancer EX offers a more premium feel with a unibody construction and four doors, the Ecosport's body-on-frame chassis and hatchback design provide superior practicality for navigating Philippine traffic with its 5-door configuration. If power is the priority, the Lancer EX edges out the Ecosport with 117 PS versus 110 PS, but the Ecosport's 142 Nm torque is slightly lower. Ultimately, the Ecosport wins on price and versatility, while the Lancer EX appeals to those seeking a sedan lifestyle with slightly more peak power.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Ecosport 1.5 Trend MT is cheaper at ₱908,000 compared to the Mitsubishi Lancer EX 1.6L GLS MT priced at ₱928,000.
Which car has more engine power?
The Mitsubishi Lancer EX generates more power with 117 PS at 6000 rpm, whereas the Ford Ecosport produces 110 PS at 6300 rpm.
Which car is better for daily commuting in the Philippines?
The Ford Ecosport is generally better for daily commuting due to its hatchback body type, 5 doors, and body-on-frame construction, which offers more practicality than the Lancer EX's sedan body-on-frame and 4 doors.
Do both vehicles have the same warranty?
Yes, both the Ford Ecosport and Mitsubishi Lancer EX offer an identical warranty of 100,000km or 3 years.