Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) vs Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) vs Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) Ford ₱709,000 | Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) Honda ₱631,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000kms/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1339cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 120 PS @ 3700 rpm | 100 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 285 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 127 Nm @ 4800 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick-up | Hatchback |
| Segment | Pick-Up | A |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5113 | 3610 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1680 |
| Height (mm) | 1703 | 1485 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2345 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 35 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 935 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 16'' Steel | 14x5 |
| Rear Wheels | 16'' Steel | 14x5 |
| Front Tires | 215/70 R16 | 175/65 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 215/70 R16 | 175/65 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | No | No |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Single Zone Automatic | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Vinyl | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Standard Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | — | no |
| 0–100 km/h | — | no |
| Top Speed | — | no |
| Fuel Economy (City) | — | no |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | — | no |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | — | no |
| Emission Standard | — | Euro4 |
Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) vs Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer, the Honda Brio 1.3 S is the logical choice for daily commuting, city driving, and fuel economy due to its naturally aspirated 1.3L engine and Front-Wheel Drive layout, which offers better maneuverability and lower maintenance costs compared to the heavy-duty Ford. However, the Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L is the superior pick for those needing serious utility, towing capability, or off-road readiness, provided the buyer can handle the higher price tag and the lack of passenger seating. The Ford's 2.2L turbo diesel engine delivers significantly more torque (285 Nm) and power (120 PS) than the Honda's 1.3L unit, making it ideal for carrying heavy loads or working in rugged terrain. Ultimately, choose the Honda Brio for affordable, practical city transport, and the Ford Ranger for work or utility where raw power and durability are prioritized over passenger comfort. The Honda is currently available, whereas the Ford is discontinued, which may affect long-term parts availability and resale value for the Ford.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Honda Brio 1.3 S is cheaper at ₱631,000 compared to the Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L MT, which costs ₱709,000.
Which engine is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger 2.2L is more powerful with 120 PS @ 3700 rpm and 285 Nm of torque, whereas the Honda Brio 1.3 S produces only 100 PS @ 6000 rpm and 127 Nm of torque.
Which one is better for city commuting?
The Honda Brio 1.3 S is better for city commuting due to its naturally aspirated engine, lighter weight, and Front-Wheel Drive layout, while the Ford Ranger is designed for utility with a 2-door body style and 5113mm length.
Are both vehicles still available to buy?
The Honda Brio 1.3 S is currently available, but the Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L MT is discontinued.