Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) Ford ₱709,000 | Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) Mitsubishi ₱688,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-3 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1193cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 12-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 120 PS @ 3700 rpm | 78 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 285 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 100 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | INVECS-III CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10.5 : 1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick-up | Hatchback |
| Segment | Pick-Up | B |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 5113 | 3795 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1665 |
| Height (mm) | 1703 | 1500 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2450 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 35 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 845 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 16'' Steel | 14x4.5 |
| Rear Wheels | 16'' Steel | 14x4.5 |
| Front Tires | 215/70 R16 | 165/65 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 215/70 R16 | 165/65 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Electronic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Single Zone Automatic | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Vinyl | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Standard Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | Yes |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | — | Euro-4 |
Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and practical vehicle with decent power output, the Ford Ranger Cab & Chasis is recommended over the Mitsubishi Mirage. The Ranger offers more seating capacity, better towing capacity, and durability suited for rough terrain and longer commutes despite being slightly older and less available.
Frequently asked questions
Which car is cheaper between the Ford Ranger and Mitsubishi Mirage?
The Ford Ranger costs ₱709,000 while the Mitsubishi Mirage is priced at ₱688,000.
Which vehicle offers better power output?
The Mitsubishi Mirage outperforms the Ford Ranger with more power (78 PS vs 120 PS) and torque (100 Nm vs 285 Nm).
Is one car better for daily commuting than the other?
While both offer practicality, the Ford Ranger's RWD drivetrain might provide a smoother ride and better handling on rough roads, making it slightly more suitable for daily commuting.
Which vehicle has a longer warranty period?
Both vehicles come with a 100,000km/3-years warranty, so there is no difference in this regard between the Ford Ranger and Mitsubishi Mirage.