Ford Ranger Single Cab 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Single Cab 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Single Cab 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) Ford ₱769,000 | Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) Mitsubishi ₱688,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-3 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1193cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 12-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 120 PS @ 3700 rpm | 78 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 285 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm | 100 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | INVECS-III CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10.5 : 1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick-up | Hatchback |
| Segment | Pick-Up | B |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 3795 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1665 |
| Height (mm) | 1703 | 1500 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2450 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 35 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 845 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 16'' Steel | 14x4.5 |
| Rear Wheels | 16'' Steel | 14x4.5 |
| Front Tires | 215/70 R16 | 165/65 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 215/70 R16 | 165/65 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Electronic |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | tilt |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Single Zone Automatic | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Vinyl | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Standard Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | Yes |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | No | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | — | Euro-4 |
Ford Ranger Single Cab 2.2L 4×2 MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer prioritizing raw power and off-road capability, the Ford Ranger Single Cab is the superior choice despite its higher price. At ₱769,000, it offers a turbocharged 2.2L diesel engine producing 120 PS and 285 Nm of torque, paired with a 5-speed manual and a robust body-on-frame construction. This vehicle is ideal for those needing serious utility, towing, or rugged terrain handling, though it is discontinued and lacks passenger space with only 2 seats. Conversely, the Mitsubishi Mirage at ₱688,000 is the clear winner for city commuting and budget-conscious buyers. Its naturally aspirated 1.2L gas engine, CVT transmission, and unibody design provide excellent fuel economy and comfort for daily errands. The Mirage's lower price, 5-door configuration, and current availability make it the practical choice for families or commuters who prioritize affordability and ease of use over heavy-duty performance.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT is cheaper at ₱688,000 compared to the Ford Ranger Single Cab 2.2L 4×2 MT, which costs ₱769,000.
Which engine is more powerful?
The Ford Ranger's turbocharged 2.2L inline-4 is significantly more powerful, delivering 120 PS and 285 Nm of torque, whereas the Mitsubishi Mirage's 1.2L inline-3 produces only 78 PS and 100 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting in the Philippines?
The Mitsubishi Mirage is better for daily commuting due to its lower price, 5-door configuration, unibody construction, and naturally aspirated gas engine designed for city driving.
Is the Ford Ranger still available to buy?
No, the Ford Ranger Single Cab 2.2L 4×2 MT is discontinued, while the Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT is currently available.