Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2015) vs Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2015) vs Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2015) Ford ₱1,709,000 | Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) Toyota ₱1,861,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Not available |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-5 | Flat-4 |
| Displacement | 3198 | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 20-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 200 PS @ 3000 rpm | 200 PS @ 7000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm | 205 Nm @ 6400-6600 rpm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | Coupe |
| Segment | Pick-Up | S |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4255 |
| Width (mm) | 2198 | 1795 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2570 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | — |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1298 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Double Wishbone |
| Front Wheels | 18 | 17x7" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 18 | 17x7" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 265/60 R18 | 215/45 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/60 R18 | 215/45 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | tilt |
| Steering Ratio | — | 5.4 |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual-zone EATC | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather with Red Stitching |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | HID |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Ford Ranger Wildtrak 3.2L 4×4 AT (2015) vs Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer prioritizing utility and off-road capability, the Ford Ranger Wildtrak is the superior choice. It offers a 4WD drivetrain and a 3.2L turbocharged diesel engine producing 200 PS, making it ideal for hauling or rough terrain. Conversely, the Toyota 86 Aero is strictly for enthusiasts seeking a lightweight, naturally aspirated sports coupe with 200 PS of high-revving power. Key differentiators include the Ranger's 4WD system versus the 86's RWD layout, and the Ranger's 5+2 seating versus the 86's 2+2 configuration. While both cost around ₱1.7-1.86 million, the Ranger is discontinued and the 86 is no longer available, so availability must be checked locally. Choose the Ranger for work and the 86 for driving fun.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak is priced at ₱1,709,000, which is ₱152,000 cheaper than the Toyota 86 Aero at ₱1,861,000.
Which car has more power?
Both vehicles produce 200 PS, but the Ford Ranger generates its power at 3000 rpm using a turbo, while the Toyota 86 reaches 200 PS at 7000 rpm with a naturally aspirated engine.
Which is better for daily commuting in the Philippines?
The Ford Ranger is better for daily commuting due to its 4WD drivetrain, 5277mm length, and 5-passenger capacity (2+3), whereas the Toyota 86 is a 2-door coupe with only 2+2 seating.
Are these vehicles still available to buy?
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak is discontinued, and the Toyota 86 Aero is listed as not available, meaning buyers may need to find used units or wait for new stock.