Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 AT (2015) Ford ₱1,279,000 | Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026) Mitsubishi ₱1,259,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2198cc | 1459cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 160 PS @ 3200 rpm | 105 PS |
| Max Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm | 141 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic 4-Speed |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pick Up | MPV AUV |
| Segment | Pick-Up | MPV |
| Construction | Body On Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3+2 |
| Length (mm) | 5277 | 4595 |
| Width (mm) | 2163 | 1750 |
| Height (mm) | 1821 | 1750 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3220 | 2775 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 80 | 45 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Green Bronze Metallic With Black Roof. Quartz White Pearl With Black Roof, Sunrise Orange Metallic With Black Roof |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1260 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Coil Spring | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Leaf Spring | Torsion beam w/Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17" Alloys | 17 |
| Rear Wheels | 17" Alloys | 17 |
| Front Tires | 265/65 R17 | 205/55R17 |
| Rear Tires | 265/65 R17 | 205/55R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Column | — | Tilt & Telescope |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | No |
| Traction Control | Yes | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | Yes | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Single Zone Automatic | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L 4×2 AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Xpander GLS AT (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and capable vehicle with good towing capacity, the Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L is a better choice. It offers more power, better torque, and better fuel efficiency than the Mitsubishi XPANDER. The Ford's 160 PS at 3200 rpm and 385 Nm at 1600-2500 rpm make it ideal for towing and off-road conditions. Additionally, its 4×2 setup provides more traction in rough terrain. For those who prioritize fuel economy and daily commuting, the Mitsubishi XPANDER GLS is a better option with its naturally aspirated engine and automatic transmission.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle has more power?
The Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L has more power than the Mitsubishi XPANDER GLS. The Ford produces 160 PS at 3200 rpm, while the Mitsubishi produces only 105 PS.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
The Mitsubishi XPANDER GLS is better for daily commuting due to its naturally aspirated engine and automatic transmission, which provide smoother driving experience compared to the Ford's turbocharged inline-4 engine.
Which vehicle has a longer warranty?
The Mitsubishi XPANDER GLS comes with a 3-year/100,000 km warranty, while the Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L only offers a 3-years/100,000 km warranty.
Which vehicle is more available in stock?
The Mitsubishi XPANDER GLS is currently available, whereas the Ford Ranger XLT 2.2L is discontinued and not available for purchase anymore.