Foton Blizzard Turbo 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) vs Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Foton Blizzard Turbo 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) vs Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Foton Blizzard Turbo 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) Foton ₱713,000 | Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) Honda ₱631,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000kms/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 2771cc | 1339cc |
| Valvetrain | OHV 8-valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Direct Injection | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 92 PS @ 3600 rpm | 100 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 202 Nm @ 2300 rpm | 127 Nm @ 4800 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Segment | Pickup | A |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 5160 | 3610 |
| Width (mm) | 1750 | 1680 |
| Height (mm) | 1730 | 1485 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3025 | 2345 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1705 | 935 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 35 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Rigid Axle | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 15x7.0" Alloys | 14x5 |
| Rear Wheels | 15x7.0" Alloys | 14x5 |
| Front Tires | 225/75/R15 | 175/65 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 225/75/R15 | 175/65 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | — | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | — | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | No | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen + Foglamps | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | — | no |
| 0–100 km/h | — | no |
| Top Speed | — | no |
| Fuel Economy (City) | — | no |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | — | no |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | — | no |
| Emission Standard | — | Euro4 |
Foton Blizzard Turbo 4×2 MT Dsl (2015) vs Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and practical vehicle with decent power output, the Foton Blizzard Turbo is the better choice. It offers more torque and power compared to the Honda Brio, making it suitable for towing and rough terrain. The Foton also has a longer warranty period and is currently available in the market.
Frequently asked questions
Which car is cheaper between the Foton Blizzard Turbo and Honda Brio?
The Foton Blizzard Turbo is cheaper at ₱713,000 compared to the Honda Brio at ₱631,000.
Which car has better power output?
The Foton Blizzard Turbo has more torque and power with 202 Nm @ 2300 rpm compared to the Honda Brio's 127 Nm @ 4800 rpm.
Is one of these cars better for daily commuting than the other?
Both vehicles are suitable for daily commuting, but the Foton Blizzard Turbo is more robust and has a longer warranty period which makes it a safer choice for frequent use.
Which car offers better fuel economy?
There is no information provided about fuel economy for either vehicle in this data set. Both cars have 5-speed manual transmissions and similar engine specifications, so their fuel efficiency cannot be compared directly.