Haima 2 1.5 GLS C-Sport Hatchback MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Haima 2 1.5 GLS C-Sport Hatchback MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Haima 2 1.5 GLS C-Sport Hatchback MT (2015) Haima ₱699,000 | Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) Mitsubishi ₱688,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-3 |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 12-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 105 PS @ 6000 rpm | 78 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 140 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 100 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | INVECS-III CVT |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Displacement | — | 1193cc |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10.5 : 1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Segment | B | B |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 3918 | 3795 |
| Width (mm) | 1725 | 1665 |
| Height (mm) | 1518 | 1500 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2500 | 2450 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 845 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 35 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 15-inch Alloys | 14x4.5 |
| Rear Wheels | 15-inch Alloys | 14x4.5 |
| Front Tires | 185/55/R15 | 165/65 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 185/55/R15 | 165/65 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Electronic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | No |
| Security Alarm | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Standard Key | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | Yes |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen + Foglamps | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | — | Euro-4 |
Haima 2 1.5 GLS C-Sport Hatchback MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and efficient hatchback with decent power output, the Haima 2 GLS C-Sport is recommended over the Mitsubishi Mirage. The Haima offers slightly better performance with more torque at lower RPMs, making it suitable for daily driving needs and handling some inclines. Additionally, its naturally aspirated engine provides a smoother driving experience compared to the CVT of the Mirage. Despite being priced higher, the warranty duration is longer on the Haima (10 years/100kkm) compared to the Mirage's 3 years/60kkm. For those who prioritize cost and are willing to accept lower power output and a manual transmission, the Mitsubishi Mirage is a solid choice.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle offers better fuel efficiency?
The Haima does not provide specific fuel economy figures, but its naturally aspirated engine might offer slightly better fuel efficiency compared to the CVT of the Mirage due to lower power output and torque requirements.
What is the warranty period for each car?
Both cars come with a 100,000km/3-year warranty. However, the Haima has an extended warranty duration of 10 years compared to the Mirage's 3 years.
Which vehicle is more suitable for daily commuting?
The Haima is recommended for daily commuting due to its better torque output and smoother driving experience provided by a manual transmission.
What are the differences in engine types between the two vehicles?
The Haima has an Inline-4 engine with DOHC 16-valve, while the Mirage has an Inline-3 engine with DOHC 12-valve. The Haima also offers naturally aspirated power, whereas the Mirage uses a CVT transmission.