Haima 2 C-Sport Hatchback MT (2015) vs Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Haima 2 C-Sport Hatchback MT (2015) vs Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Haima 2 C-Sport Hatchback MT (2015) Haima ₱649,000 | Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) Honda ₱631,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000kms/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1342cc | 1339cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | SOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 92 PS @ 6000 rpm | 100 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 126 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 127 Nm @ 4800 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Segment | B | A |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 3890 | 3610 |
| Width (mm) | 1695 | 1680 |
| Height (mm) | 1480 | 1485 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2500 | 2345 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1055 | 935 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 35 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 15x5.5" Alloys | 14x5 |
| Rear Wheels | 15x5.5" Alloys | 14x5 |
| Front Tires | 185/55/R15 | 175/65 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 185/55/R15 | 175/65 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Security Alarm | — | No |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | No | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen + Foglamps | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | No |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | — | no |
| 0–100 km/h | — | no |
| Top Speed | — | no |
| Fuel Economy (City) | — | no |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | — | no |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | — | no |
| Emission Standard | — | Euro4 |
Haima 2 C-Sport Hatchback MT (2015) vs Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for an affordable and reliable hatchback with decent power and practicality, the Haima 2 C-Sport Hatchback MT is recommended. It offers better performance in terms of maximum torque and power compared to the Honda Brio, making it more suitable for daily commuting and occasional driving needs. The Haima also comes at a lower price point.
Frequently asked questions
Which car is cheaper between Haima 2 C-Sport Hatchback MT and Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT?
The Haima 2 C-Sport Hatchback MT is cheaper than the Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT by ₱18,000.
Which car has better power output between Haima 2 C-Sport Hatchback MT and Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT?
The Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT outperforms the Haima 2 C-Sport Hatchback MT in terms of maximum torque (127 Nm vs 126 Nm) and power (100 PS vs 92 PS).
Which car is more suitable for daily commuting?
The Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT is better suited for daily commuting due to its higher maximum torque, which provides smoother acceleration and improved handling on city roads.
Does the Haima have any fuel economy data?
No fuel economy data is provided in the specifications for either vehicle, so comparisons based on this metric are not possible with the given information.