Honda Accord 2.4 S AT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda Accord 2.4 S AT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda Accord 2.4 S AT (White Pearl) (2015) Honda ₱1,760,000 | Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) Toyota ₱1,861,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000kms/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Not available |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Flat-4 |
| Displacement | 2356cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally aspirated, i-VTEC with Earth Dreams Technology | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 175 PS @ 6200 rpm | 200 PS @ 7000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 225 Nm @ 4000 rpm | 205 Nm @ 6400-6600 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | no | — |
| Emission Standard | Euro4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Segment | D | S |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4890 | 4255 |
| Width (mm) | 1850 | 1795 |
| Height (mm) | 1465 | 1285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2775 | 2570 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1542 | 1298 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 65 | — |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Independent Multi-Link Coil w/ Stabilizer | Double Wishbone |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.5" Alloys | 17x7" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.5" Alloys | 17x7" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 225/50 R17 | 215/45 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 225/50 R17 | 215/45 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | — |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Ratio | — | 5.4 |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | No |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Full Auto | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather with Red Stitching |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Smart Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | Yes | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | Yes | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | Glass Printed | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | LED + Projector | HID |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Honda Accord 2.4 S AT (White Pearl) (2015) vs Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015): which should you buy?
For the Filipino buyer prioritizing daily comfort, fuel efficiency, and practicality, the Honda Accord 2.4 S AT is the clear choice. It offers a larger 2.4L engine with 175 PS compared to the Toyota 86's 2.0L flat-4 producing 200 PS, yet costs ₱101,000 less. The Accord's 5-speed automatic transmission and front-wheel drive provide a smoother, more practical experience for city commuting and carrying passengers, whereas the Toyota 86 Aero, priced at ₱1,861,000, is a niche sports car with a 6-speed automatic, rear-wheel drive, and only 2+2 seating capacity. The 86 is better for enthusiasts seeking raw power and a sporty coupe look, but the Accord wins on value, utility, and everyday drivability.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Honda Accord 2.4 S AT is cheaper at ₱1,760,000, while the Toyota 86 Aero costs ₱1,861,000.
Which engine produces more power?
The Toyota 86 Aero generates more power with 200 PS, compared to the Honda Accord's 175 PS.
Which car is better for daily commuting in the Philippines?
The Honda Accord is better for daily commuting due to its front-wheel drive layout, automatic transmission, and larger 2.4L displacement versus the 86's rear-wheel drive and smaller 2.0L engine.
What is the main difference in seating capacity?
The Honda Accord accommodates more passengers with a standard seating capacity, while the Toyota 86 Aero is a 2-door coupe designed for 2+2 seating.