Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) vs Toyota Wigo 1.0 E MT (2017)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) vs Toyota Wigo 1.0 E MT (2017) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) Honda ₱631,000 | Toyota Wigo 1.0 E MT (2017) Toyota ₱537,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2017 |
| Warranty | 100,000kms/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1339cc | 998cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC | EFI |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 100 PS @ 6000 rpm | 66 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 127 Nm @ 4800 rpm | 89 NM @ 4400 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-Speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | no | — |
| Emission Standard | Euro4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatch |
| Segment | A | B |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 3610 | 3660 |
| Width (mm) | 1680 | 1600 |
| Height (mm) | 1485 | 1520 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2345 | 0 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 935 | 835 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 35 | 33 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 14x5 | 14? |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5 | 14? |
| Front Tires | 175/65 R14 | 175/65 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 175/65 R14 | 175/65 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | — |
| Steering Type | EPS | Electronic |
| Steering Column | tilt | — |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | No | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Manual locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | no |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | No |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) vs Toyota Wigo 1.0 E MT (2017): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers comparing the 2015 Honda Brio 1.3 S MT (₱631,000) and the 2017 Toyota Wigo 1.0 E MT (₱537,000), the choice hinges on budget and power needs. The Wigo is significantly cheaper (₱94,000 less) and newer, making it ideal for budget-conscious buyers seeking a basic city car. However, the Brio offers substantially more power (100 PS vs 66 PS) and torque (127 Nm vs 89 Nm) thanks to its larger 1.3L engine with i-VTEC, providing better acceleration and highway capability. The Wigo’s 1.0L engine is adequate for light city driving but may struggle on inclines or at higher speeds. Both are manual hatchbacks with FWD and 5-speed transmissions, but the Brio’s stronger engine makes it more versatile for mixed driving conditions. Practicality-wise, the Wigo is compact (3660mm length) and likely more fuel-efficient, though no fuel economy data is available. The Brio has a longer warranty (100,000 km vs 100,000 km, both 3 years). For daily commuting in congested Metro Manila, the Wigo’s lower price and newer model year are appealing, but if you frequently drive on expressways or need extra power for overtaking, the Brio is worth the premium. Ultimately, choose the Wigo for maximum savings and the Brio for superior performance.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, the Honda Brio or Toyota Wigo?
The Toyota Wigo 1.0 E MT (2017) is cheaper at ₱537,000 compared to the Honda Brio 1.3 S MT (2015) at ₱631,000, a difference of ₱94,000.
Which car is more powerful?
The Honda Brio produces 100 PS and 127 Nm torque, significantly more than the Toyota Wigo's 66 PS and 89 Nm, making the Brio the more powerful choice.
Which is better for daily commuting?
For daily commuting in city traffic, the Toyota Wigo’s lower price, newer model year, and compact size make it a practical choice. However, the Honda Brio offers more power for faster acceleration when needed.
Which car has better fuel economy?
No fuel economy data is provided for either vehicle. Generally, the smaller engine in the Toyota Wigo (1.0L vs 1.3L) suggests better fuel efficiency, but actual figures are unknown.