Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) vs Suzuki Carry 1.5 Cab and Chassis (2020)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) vs Suzuki Carry 1.5 Cab and Chassis (2020) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) Honda ₱631,000 | Suzuki Carry 1.5 Cab and Chassis (2020) Suzuki ₱614,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2020 |
| Warranty | 100,000kms/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1339cc | 1462cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 100 PS @ 6000 rpm | 96 PS @ 3500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 127 Nm @ 4800 rpm | 135 Nm @ 4400 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10:1 |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | no | — |
| Emission Standard | Euro4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Segment | A | Pickup |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 3610 | 4195 |
| Width (mm) | 1680 | 1765 |
| Height (mm) | 1485 | 1910 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2345 | 2205 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 935 | 1065 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 35 | 43 |
| Exterior Colors | — | White |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 14x5 | 13 |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5 | 13 |
| Front Tires | 175/65 R14 | 165/80/R13 |
| Rear Tires | 175/65 R14 | 165/80/R13 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | No | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Manual Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Vinyl |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) vs Suzuki Carry 1.5 Cab and Chassis (2020): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for a reliable and practical hatchback with good fuel efficiency, the Honda Brio might be the better choice despite its slightly older model year. The Honda offers more power and torque, which can be beneficial in urban driving conditions. On the other hand, the Suzuki Carry's RWD setup provides better handling and performance on rough roads, making it a suitable option for those who frequently drive off-road or through bumpy terrain. For daily commuting, the Honda Brio is likely to offer more economical fuel consumption.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper between Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) and Suzuki Carry 1.5 Cab and Chassis (2020)?
The Suzuki Carry 1.5 Cab and Chassis (2020) is slightly cheaper at ₱614,000 compared to the Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) priced at ₱631,000.
Which vehicle has better performance in terms of power and torque?
The Suzuki Carry 1.5 Cab and Chassis (2020) offers better performance with a higher maximum power output of 96 PS @ 3500 rpm and a greater maximum torque of 135 Nm @ 4400 rpm compared to the Honda Brio's 100 PS @ 6000 rpm and 127 Nm @ 4800 rpm.
Which vehicle is more suitable for daily commuting?
The Honda Brio is a better choice for daily commuting due to its higher fuel efficiency, which isn't specified but generally indicated by the lack of combined fuel economy data compared to the Suzuki Carry's unspecified figures.
What type of transmission does each vehicle have and what are their respective drivetrain types?
Both vehicles use a 5-speed manual (M/T) transmission. The Honda Brio is front-wheel drive (FWD), while the Suzuki Carry has rear-wheel drive (RWD).