Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) vs Suzuki Carry 1.5 Cargo Van (2020)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) vs Suzuki Carry 1.5 Cargo Van (2020) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) Honda ₱631,000 | Suzuki Carry 1.5 Cargo Van (2020) Suzuki ₱699,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2020 |
| Warranty | 100,000kms/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1339cc | 1462cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gasoline |
| Max Power | 100 PS @ 6000 rpm | 96 PS @ 3500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 127 Nm @ 4800 rpm | 135 Nm @ 4400 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | 5-speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10:1 |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | no | — |
| Emission Standard | Euro4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
| Segment | A | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2 |
| Length (mm) | 3610 | 4195 |
| Width (mm) | 1680 | 1765 |
| Height (mm) | 1485 | 1910 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2345 | 2205 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 935 | 1065 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 35 | 43 |
| Exterior Colors | — | White |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | MacPherson Strut w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 14x5 | 13 |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5 | 13 |
| Front Tires | 175/65 R14 | 165/80/R13 |
| Rear Tires | 175/65 R14 | 165/80/R13 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | No | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Manual Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Vinyl |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | No |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) vs Suzuki Carry 1.5 Cargo Van (2020): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer comparing the Honda Brio 1.3 S Hatchback MT (2015) at ₱631,000 and the Suzuki Carry 1.5 Cargo Van (2020) at ₱699,000, the choice depends on primary use. The Brio is a front-wheel-drive hatchback with 100 PS and 127 Nm, ideal for daily commuting and city driving due to its smaller size and lower price. Its i-VTEC engine offers smooth power delivery, and it's a conventional passenger car. The Carry is a rear-wheel-drive cargo van with 96 PS and 135 Nm, built on a body-on-frame chassis for durability and load capacity. It has higher torque for hauling, a larger 1.5L engine, and a 2020 model year, but it's more expensive and designed for commercial use with only 2 doors and limited passenger comfort. If you need a reliable, economical daily driver, the Brio is the better value. If you require a workhorse for transporting goods, the Carry justifies its premium with greater utility and payload capability. Note that the Brio is older (2015) and lacks modern features; the Carry is newer but spartan. Choose based on whether passenger comfort or cargo space matters more.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, the Honda Brio or the Suzuki Carry?
The Honda Brio is cheaper at ₱631,000 compared to the Suzuki Carry at ₱699,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Honda Brio has more horsepower (100 PS) while the Suzuki Carry has more torque (135 Nm). The Carry's 1.5L engine produces 96 PS.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Honda Brio is better for daily commuting because it is a smaller hatchback with front-wheel drive, lower price, and better fuel efficiency expected from a lighter car. The Suzuki Carry is a commercial van with rear-wheel drive designed for cargo.
Is the Suzuki Carry suitable for carrying cargo?
Yes, the Suzuki Carry is a cargo van with a body-on-frame construction, 2 doors, and a larger 1.5L engine producing 135 Nm of torque, making it ideal for hauling goods.