Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (2015) Honda ₱791,000 | Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) Mitsubishi ₱688,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000kms/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-3 |
| Displacement | 1339cc | 1193cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | DOHC 12-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 100 PS @ 6000 rpm | 78 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 127 Nm @ 4800 rpm | 100 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed A/T | INVECS-III CVT |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10.5 : 1 |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | 18.27 | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | 20.37 | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 19.32 | — |
| Emission Standard | Euro4 | Euro-4 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Segment | A | B |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 3610 | 3795 |
| Width (mm) | 1680 | 1665 |
| Height (mm) | 1485 | 1500 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2345 | 2450 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 970 | 845 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 35 | 35 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 14x5 | 14x4.5 |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5 | 14x4.5 |
| Front Tires | 175/65 R14 | 165/65 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 175/65 R14 | 165/65 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Electronic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | Yes |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016): which should you buy?
For budget-conscious buyers looking for a reliable and economical hatchback, the Mitsubishi Mirage GLX CVT is the better choice at ₱688k compared to the Honda Brio's ₱791k. The Mirage offers more power (78 PS vs 100 PS), has a higher fuel economy rating (20.37 mpg highway, 19.32 combined vs 18.27 city mpg for Brio), and is equipped with CVT transmission instead of the A/T in Honda's model. It also meets Euro-4 emission standards while the Brio uses i-VTEC technology. For those seeking a more powerful car, the Honda Brio may be preferable despite its higher price.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle has better fuel economy?
The Mitsubishi Mirage GLX CVT offers better fuel economy with 20.37 mpg highway and 19.32 combined mpg compared to the Honda Brio's 18.27 city, 20.37 highway, and 19.32 combined mpg.
Which vehicle is more powerful?
The Honda Brio outpowers the Mitsubishi Mirage GLX CVT with a maximum power of 100 PS compared to the Mirage's 78 PS.
Which car is better for daily commuting?
Considering fuel economy and practicality, the Mitsubishi Mirage GLX CVT is the better choice as it offers higher combined mpg (19.32) compared to the Honda Brio's (19.32).
Which vehicle has a longer warranty period?
Both vehicles come with the same 100,000km/3-years warranty period, so there is no difference in this regard.