Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (2015) Honda ₱791,000 | Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016) Toyota ₱841,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000kms/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1339cc | 1329cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 100 PS @ 6000 rpm | 99 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 127 Nm @ 4800 rpm | 123 Nm @ 4400 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed A/T | CVT |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | 18.27 | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | 20.37 | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | 19.32 | — |
| Emission Standard | Euro4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Segment | A | B |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 3610 | 4410 |
| Width (mm) | 1680 | 1700 |
| Height (mm) | 1485 | 1475 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2345 | 2550 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 970 | — |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 35 | 42 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 14x5 | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5 | 15 |
| Front Tires | 175/65 R14 | 185/60 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 175/65 R14 | 185/60 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Power |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 4 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Honda Brio 1.3 V Hatchback AT (2015) vs Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT (2016): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers looking for a budget-friendly, fuel-efficient hatchback with decent power, the 2015 Honda Brio 1.3 V AT is the clear choice. Priced at ₱791,000—₱50,000 cheaper than the Toyota Vios—it offers a slightly higher maximum power (100 PS vs 99 PS) and torque (127 Nm vs 123 Nm). Its inline‑4, SOHC 16‑valve engine with i‑VTEC delivers a smooth 18.27 km/L city and 20.37 km/L highway economy, making it ideal for daily commuting in urban areas. The Brio’s 5‑speed automatic is straightforward and reliable, while its FWD layout keeps maintenance simple. The Vios, though a sedan with a longer 4‑door body and more seats (2+3), is priced higher at ₱841,000 and offers only marginally less power. Its DOHC 16‑valve engine is comparable, but the CVT transmission may feel less engaging for some drivers. The Vios’ unibody construction and 4410 mm length give it a more spacious interior, which could be advantageous for families or those needing extra cargo space. However, the Brio’s lower price and comparable performance make it more attractive for single drivers or couples who prioritize cost, fuel economy, and a compact footprint. If you need more interior room and don’t mind paying extra, the Vios is a solid option; otherwise, the Brio delivers better value for most everyday users.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Honda Brio 1.3 V AT costs ₱791,000, while the Toyota Vios 1.3 E CVT is priced at ₱841,000.
Which has more power?
The Honda Brio offers 100 PS at 6000 rpm, slightly higher than the Vios’s 99 PS at the same rpm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
Both cars have similar fuel economy figures, but the Brio’s lower price and compact hatchback design make it more convenient for city driving.
Which has a larger interior?
The Toyota Vios is a 4‑door sedan with a length of 4410 mm, offering more interior space compared to the Brio’s hatchback layout.