Honda CR-V 2.0 S AT (2015) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda CR-V 2.0 S AT (2015) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda CR-V 2.0 S AT (2015) Honda ₱1,503,000 | Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X (2026) Ford ₱1,599,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000kms/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1997cc | 1498cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Hybrid |
| Max Power | 153 PS @ 6500 rpm | 150 PS |
| Max Torque | 190 Nm @ 4300 rpm | 230 Nm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | 2WD | FWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | no | — |
| Emission Standard | Euro4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4582 | 4685 |
| Width (mm) | 1820 | 1935 |
| Height (mm) | 1685 | 1706 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2620 | 2726 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1485 | 1611 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 58 | 60 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Crystal Pearl White, Star White, Oasis Green, Blue Panther, Panther Black |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone w/ Stabilizer | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7 | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7 | 19 |
| Front Tires | 225/65 R17 | 235/50R19 |
| Rear Tires | 225/65 R17 | 235/50R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Foot Brake | EPB |
| Key Type | Smart Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | Yes | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6 | 8 |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID Projector | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Honda CR-V 2.0 S AT (2015) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X (2026): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers, the choice between the Honda CR-V 2.0 S AT (2015) and the Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X (2026) boils down to budget and fuel efficiency priorities. The CR-V is ₱1.503M, ₱96,000 cheaper, but it's a discontinued 2015 model with a conventional 2.0L gas engine (153 PS, 190 Nm) and a 5-speed automatic. The Territory is ₱1.599M, current, and features a 1.5L turbo hybrid powertrain (150 PS, 230 Nm) with an automatic transmission, offering better torque and likely superior fuel economy for city driving. Both have similar warranty (3 years/100k km) and 5 seats. The CR-V suits buyers on a tighter budget who prioritize lower upfront cost and don't mind older tech. The Territory is better for those who want a modern, fuel-efficient hybrid with more torque for daily commuting or stop-and-go traffic. If you value new-car features and hybrid efficiency, the Territory is worth the extra cost; if you need a proven, cheaper SUV, the CR-V remains a solid choice.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper between the Honda CR-V 2015 and Ford Territory 2026?
The Honda CR-V 2.0 S AT (2015) is cheaper at ₱1,503,000 versus the Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X (2026) at ₱1,599,000, a difference of ₱96,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Honda CR-V has slightly higher peak power at 153 PS, while the Ford Territory has 150 PS. However, the Territory produces more torque (230 Nm vs 190 Nm), giving it better low-end response.
Which is better for daily commuting?
The Ford Territory Hybrid is likely better for daily commuting due to its hybrid system and higher torque (230 Nm), which improves fuel efficiency and responsiveness in stop-and-go traffic, plus it's a current model.
Is the Ford Territory newer than the Honda CR-V?
Yes, the Ford Territory Hybrid Titanium X is a 2026 model and currently available, while the Honda CR-V is a 2015 model and discontinued.