Honda CR-V 2.0 V AT (2015) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Trend (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda CR-V 2.0 V AT (2015) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Trend (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda CR-V 2.0 V AT (2015) Honda ₱1,373,000 | Ford Territory Hybrid Trend (2026) Ford ₱1,399,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000kms/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1997cc | 1498cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Hybrid |
| Max Power | 153 PS @ 6500 rpm | 150 PS |
| Max Torque | 190 Nm @ 4300 rpm | 230 Nm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | 2WD | FWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | no | — |
| Emission Standard | Euro4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4582 | 4685 |
| Width (mm) | 1820 | 1935 |
| Height (mm) | 1685 | 1706 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2620 | 2726 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1469 | 1611 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 58 | 60 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Blue Panther, Crystal Pearl White, Oasis Green, Panther Black, Star White |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone w/ Stabilizer | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7 | 18 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7 | 18 |
| Front Tires | 225/65 R17 | 235/55R18 |
| Rear Tires | 225/65 R17 | 235/55R18 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | EPS | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Foot Brake | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Reflector Halogen | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | Yes |
Honda CR-V 2.0 V AT (2015) vs Ford Territory Hybrid Trend (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing price, performance, and practicality between the 2015 Honda CR‑V 2.0 V AT and the 2026 Ford Territory Hybrid Trend, the Honda remains the more economical choice. Priced at ₱1,373,000 versus ₱1,399,000 for the Ford, it offers a lower upfront cost while delivering comparable power—153 PS at 6,500 rpm versus the Ford’s 150 PS. The Honda’s torque of 190 Nm at 4,300 rpm is slightly lower than the Ford’s 230 Nm, but both engines are inline‑4 and naturally aspirated or turbocharged hybrid respectively. The CR‑V’s 5‑speed automatic transmission and 2WD drivetrain suit city driving, whereas the Ford’s FWD unibody crossover layout is better for varied road conditions. Warranty coverage is identical at 3 years/100,000 km, but the Honda’s model year (2015) means it is discontinued and may face higher maintenance costs over time. The Ford, being current with a hybrid powertrain, offers potential fuel savings and lower emissions, but its higher price offsets this advantage for most buyers. Thus, if budget and proven reliability are priorities, the Honda CR‑V is recommended; if a newer hybrid crossover with modern styling and potential fuel economy gains is desired, the Ford Territory Hybrid Trend is the better pick.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Honda CR‑V 2.0 V AT costs ₱1,373,000, while the Ford Territory Hybrid Trend is priced at ₱1,399,000.
Which has more power?
The Honda produces 153 PS at 6,500 rpm; the Ford delivers 150 PS. The Honda’s power is slightly higher.
Which offers better torque?
The Ford provides 230 Nm, higher than the Honda’s 190 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting?
Both have automatic transmissions and are suitable for city driving, but the Honda’s lower price may be more appealing for daily commuting budgets.