Honda CR-V 2.0 V AT (2015) vs Toyota Hiace Commuter (2020)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Honda CR-V 2.0 V AT (2015) vs Toyota Hiace Commuter (2020) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Honda CR-V 2.0 V AT (2015) Honda ₱1,373,000 | Toyota Hiace Commuter (2020) Toyota ₱1,396,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2020 |
| Warranty | 100,000kms/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-4 |
| Displacement | 1997cc | 2982cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, i-VTEC | Turbocharged |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Diesel |
| Max Power | 153 PS @ 6500 rpm | 136 PS @ 3400 rpm |
| Max Torque | 190 Nm @ 4300 rpm | 300 Nm @ 1200 - 2400 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed A/T | 5-speed M/T |
| Drivetrain | 2WD | RWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 16.0 |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| 0–60 mph | no | — |
| 0–100 km/h | no | — |
| Top Speed | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (City) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Highway) | no | — |
| Fuel Economy (Combined) | no | — |
| Emission Standard | Euro4 | — |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Van |
| Segment | J | Van |
| Construction | Unibody | Body-on-frame |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 3 |
| Length (mm) | 4582 | 4695 |
| Width (mm) | 1820 | 1695 |
| Height (mm) | 1685 | 1980 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2620 | 2570 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1469 | 2475 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | 58 | 70 |
| Exterior Colors | — | White |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson w/ Stabilizer | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Double Wishbone w/ Stabilizer | Leaf Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7 | 15 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7 | 15 |
| Front Tires | 225/65 R17 | 195/R15 |
| Rear Tires | 225/65 R17 | 195/R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Drum |
| Steering Type | EPS | Hydraulic |
| Steering Column | tilt + tele | Tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | No |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | No |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | No |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | Yes | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | No |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Manual Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Dual Manual Airconditioning |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Vinyl |
| Parking Brake | Foot Brake | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Standard Key |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | Yes | No |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | Yes | No |
| Antenna | no | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 | 2 |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Reflector Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | Yes | No |
Honda CR-V 2.0 V AT (2015) vs Toyota Hiace Commuter (2020): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer prioritizing modern comfort, highway efficiency, and resale value, the 2015 Honda CR-V 2.0 V AT is the superior choice. It offers a newer generation design with a 5-speed automatic transmission, 2WD drivetrain, and a 153 PS engine, making it more practical for city driving and easier to maintain than the older 2020 Hiace. Conversely, the 2020 Toyota Hiace Commuter is ideal for buyers needing a rugged, body-on-frame van with a turbocharged diesel engine producing 300 Nm of torque. While the Hiace is newer and currently available, it costs ₱23,000 more and relies on a manual transmission with RWD, which may be less suitable for single-lane Filipino roads. Ultimately, choose the CR-V for daily commuting and fuel economy, or the Hiace if you require a heavy-duty work van with maximum torque, despite its higher price and manual gearbox.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The 2015 Honda CR-V 2.0 V AT is cheaper at ₱1,373,000 compared to the 2020 Toyota Hiace Commuter priced at ₱1,396,000.
Which engine is more powerful?
The Honda CR-V produces more power with 153 PS compared to the Toyota Hiace's 136 PS, though the Hiace offers significantly more torque at 300 Nm.
Which is better for daily commuting in the Philippines?
The Honda CR-V is better for daily commuting due to its 5-speed automatic transmission, 2WD drivetrain, and naturally aspirated engine designed for city driving.
Is the Toyota Hiace a better van option?
Yes, the Toyota Hiace is a 2020 model with a body-on-frame construction, turbocharged diesel engine, and RWD drivetrain, making it a robust work van compared to the CR-V.