Isuzu Crosswind XS (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLS CVT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu Crosswind XS (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLS CVT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu Crosswind XS (2015) Isuzu ₱770,000 | Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLS CVT (2016) Mitsubishi ₱790,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Inline-3 |
| Displacement | 2499cc | 1193cc |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 8-valve | DOHC 12-valve |
| Compression Ratio | 18.5 : 1 | 10.5 : 1 |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 85 PS @ 3900 rpm | 78 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 185 Nm @ 2000 rpm | 100 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | INVECS-III CVT |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | Euro-2 | Euro-4 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | AUV | Hatchback |
| Segment | M | B |
| Construction | Body-on-frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 4480 | 3795 |
| Width (mm) | 1680 | 1665 |
| Height (mm) | 1765 | 1500 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2680 | 2450 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 850 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 35 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone with Torsion Bar Springs and Stabilizer Bar | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring with Stabilizer |
| Rear Suspension | Flex Ride MOVE Suspension, Semi-Elliptical Leaf Springs with Telescopic Shock Absorbers | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 14-inch Steel | 15x5.5 |
| Rear Wheels | 14-inch Steel | 15x5.5 |
| Front Tires | 185/80/R14 | 175/55 R15 |
| Rear Tires | 185/80/R14 | 175/55 R15 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | Electronic |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | No | Yes |
| Door Locking | Standard | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual, Single | Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | Yes |
| Seat Material | Beige-color Vinyl | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Standard Key | Keyless Operation System |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | No | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | Yes |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 | 6 |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | No | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | HID |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Isuzu Crosswind XS (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLS CVT (2016): which should you buy?
Both the Isuzu Crosswind XS (2015) and the Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLS CVT (2016) sit near the same price point – ₱770,000 versus ₱790,000 – but they serve very different needs. The Crosswind is a midsize AUV built on a body‑on‑frame chassis with rear‑wheel drive, a 2.5‑L turbo‑diesel inline‑4 that delivers 85 PS and a robust 185 Nm of torque low in the rev range (2,000 rpm). Its higher torque and RWD layout make it better suited for hauling cargo, occasional off‑road use, or driving on rough provincial roads where durability and pulling power matter. However, it carries a Euro‑2 emission rating and a modest 5‑speed manual, which may feel dated in city traffic. The Mirage, by contrast, is a compact hatchback with a lightweight 1.2‑L naturally aspirated inline‑3 gasoline engine, producing 78 PS and 100 Nm, paired to a modern CVT. Its front‑wheel‑drive, unibody construction and Euro‑4 compliance give it a smoother, more fuel‑efficient ride for congested urban commutes and tight parking. The Mirage’s smaller size, automatic‑like transmission, and newer emission standard make it the practical daily driver, while the Crosswind appeals to buyers needing extra interior space, load capacity, and ruggedness. Choose the Crosswind if you prioritize torque, cargo room, and off‑road capability; choose the Mirage if you want a city‑friendly, fuel‑efficient hatchback with an automatic‑style gearbox.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Isuzu Crosswind XS is priced at ₱770,000, which is ₱20,000 less than the Mitsubishi Mirage’s ₱790,000 price.
Which model has more power and torque?
The Crosswind’s 2.5‑L turbo diesel produces 85 PS and 185 Nm of torque, while the Mirage’s 1.2‑L gasoline engine makes 78 PS and 100 Nm, so the Crosswind is more powerful and torquey.
Which car is better suited for city commuting?
The Mirage’s compact hatchback body, front‑wheel drive, unibody construction and CVT transmission make it more maneuverable and fuel‑efficient for daily urban driving.
What are the key practical differences?
The Crosswind offers a larger AUV body, RWD, higher torque and a body‑on‑frame build for cargo and rough roads, whereas the Mirage provides a smaller hatchback size, automatic‑like CVT, and newer Euro‑4 emissions for city use.