Isuzu mu-X 2.5 LS-A 4×4 AT (Silky White Pearl) Dsl (2015) vs Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X 2.5 LS-A 4×4 AT (Silky White Pearl) Dsl (2015) vs Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu mu-X 2.5 LS-A 4×4 AT (Silky White Pearl) Dsl (2015) Isuzu ₱1,778,000 | Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) Toyota ₱1,861,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Not available |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Flat-4 |
| Displacement | 2499cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Variable Geometry Turbo | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 136 PS @ 3400 rpm | 200 PS @ 7000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 320 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm | 205 Nm @ 6400-6600 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Segment | J | S |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 4255 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 1795 |
| Height (mm) | 1840 | 1285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 2570 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1298 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Springs, Stabilizer | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Five-Link Coil Spring, Stabilizer | Double Wishbone |
| Front Wheels | 17 | 17x7" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 17 | 17x7" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 255/65/R17 | 215/45 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 255/65/R17 | 215/45 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Disc |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | — |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Ratio | — | 5.4 |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather with Red Stitching |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID + Foglamps | HID |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Isuzu mu-X 2.5 LS-A 4×4 AT (Silky White Pearl) Dsl (2015) vs Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing practicality against sportiness, the Isuzu mu‑X 2.5 LS‑A 4×4 AT is the more sensible choice if daily utility, passenger capacity and off‑road capability matter. Priced at ₱1,778,000, it is slightly cheaper than the Toyota 86 Aero (₱1,861,000) and offers a five‑door SUV layout with seating for up to seven (2+3+2), making it suitable for families or groups. Its 2.5‑L turbo‑charged diesel delivers 136 PS and a robust 320 Nm of torque low in the rev range (1800‑2800 rpm), giving better low‑end pull for city traffic and light towing. The mu‑X’s 5‑speed automatic and RWD layout are adequate for most road conditions, though it lacks the 4×4 drivetrain often expected in an SUV. The Toyota 86, by contrast, is a two‑door coupe aimed at driving enthusiasts. It packs a 2.0‑L naturally aspirated flat‑four that makes 200 PS but only 205 Nm of torque high in the rev range (6400‑6600 rpm), delivering a sportier feel but less low‑speed grunt. Its unibody construction, limited seating (2+2) and higher price make it less practical for everyday family use. In short, choose the Isuzu mu‑X for versatility, lower price and torque‑rich diesel performance; opt for the Toyota 86 only if a pure, high‑rev sports experience is the priority, accepting the higher cost and reduced practicality.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Isuzu mu‑X 2.5 LS‑A is priced at ₱1,778,000, which is ₱83,000 less than the Toyota 86 Aero at ₱1,861,000.
Which has more power?
The Toyota 86 Aero produces 200 PS, higher than the Isuzu mu‑X’s 136 PS, but the mu‑X offers significantly more torque (320 Nm vs 205 Nm).
Which is more practical for daily use?
The Isuzu mu‑X is more practical: it has five doors, seats up to seven (2+3+2), and a larger footprint, while the Toyota 86 is a two‑door coupe with only 2+2 seating.
Are both models still available?
The Isuzu mu‑X is listed as discontinued, and the Toyota 86 is marked as not available, meaning neither can be bought new from dealers at present.