Isuzu mu-X 2.5 LS-A 4×4 AT (Silky White Pearl) Dsl (2015) vs Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015)

A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X 2.5 LS-A 4×4 AT (Silky White Pearl) Dsl (2015) vs Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.

Specification Isuzu mu-X 2.5 LS-A 4×4 AT (Silky White Pearl) Dsl (2015) Isuzu ₱1,778,000 Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) Toyota ₱1,861,000
Overview
Model Year 2015 2015
Warranty 100,000km/3-years 100,000km/3-years
Availability Discontinued Not available
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Type Inline-4 Flat-4
Displacement 2499cc 1998cc
Valvetrain DOHC 16-valve DOHC 16-valve
Aspiration Variable Geometry Turbo Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type Diesel Gas
Max Power 136 PS @ 3400 rpm 200 PS @ 7000 rpm
Max Torque 320 Nm @ 1800-2800 rpm 205 Nm @ 6400-6600 rpm
Transmission 5-Speed A/T 6-Speed A/T
Drivetrain RWD RWD
Body & Dimensions
Body Type SUV Coupe
Segment J S
Doors 5 2
Seating Capacity 2+3+2 2+2
Length (mm) 4825 4255
Width (mm) 1860 1795
Height (mm) 1840 1285
Wheelbase (mm) 2845 2570
Construction — Unibody
Curb Weight (kg) — 1298
Chassis, Wheels & Brakes
Front Suspension Double Wishbone w/ Coil Springs, Stabilizer MacPherson
Rear Suspension Five-Link Coil Spring, Stabilizer Double Wishbone
Front Wheels 17 17x7" Alloys
Rear Wheels 17 17x7" Alloys
Front Tires 255/65/R17 215/45 R17
Rear Tires 255/65/R17 215/45 R17
Front Brakes Disc Disc
Rear Brakes Drum Disc
Steering Type hydraulic —
Steering Column tilt tilt
Tire Pressure Monitoring No No
Differential Lock No No
Steering Ratio — 5.4
Safety
Anti-lock Braking (ABS) Yes Yes
Electronic Brakeforce Distribution Yes No
Brake Assist No No
Parking Sensors No No
Stability Control No Yes
Traction Control No Yes
Vehicle Dynamic Control No No
Forward Collision Mitigation No No
Blind Spot Warning No No
Hill Start Assist No No
Hill Descent Control No No
Auto Stop/Start No No
Driver Airbag No Yes
Knee Airbag No No
Passenger Airbag No Yes
Front Curtain Airbags No Yes
Rear Curtain Airbags No Yes
Rear Side Airbags No Yes
Engine Immobilizer No Yes
Security Alarm Yes Yes
Door Locking Central Locking Central Locking
Comfort & Convenience
Air Conditioning Dual Zone Climate Control Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control
Rear A/C Vents Yes No
Seat Material Leather Leather with Red Stitching
Parking Brake Manual Manual
Key Type Keyless Entry Keyless Entry
Push-Button Start No Yes
Cruise Control No Yes
Multi-Info Display Yes No
Paddle Shifters No No
Reverse Camera Yes No
Auto Headlights No No
Power Windows Yes Yes
Power Seats Yes No
Remote Trunk Release No No
Eco Mode No No
Antenna yes yes
Infotainment & Audio
Touchscreen No No
Navigation No No
Bluetooth Yes No
Apple CarPlay No No
Android Auto No No
USB Yes Yes
AUX Input Yes Yes
AM/FM Radio Yes Yes
CD Player Yes Yes
DVD Player No No
MP3 Playback Yes Yes
iPod Support Yes No
SD Card Slot No No
Speakers — 6
Lighting
Headlights HID + Foglamps HID
Fog Lights Yes Yes
Daytime Running Lights No No
Keep comparing Add another model to this matchup — line up to four side by side.

Isuzu mu-X 2.5 LS-A 4×4 AT (Silky White Pearl) Dsl (2015) vs Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015): which should you buy?

For a Filipino buyer weighing practicality against sportiness, the Isuzu mu‑X 2.5 LS‑A 4×4 AT is the more sensible choice if daily utility, passenger capacity and off‑road capability matter. Priced at ₱1,778,000, it is slightly cheaper than the Toyota 86 Aero (₱1,861,000) and offers a five‑door SUV layout with seating for up to seven (2+3+2), making it suitable for families or groups. Its 2.5‑L turbo‑charged diesel delivers 136 PS and a robust 320 Nm of torque low in the rev range (1800‑2800 rpm), giving better low‑end pull for city traffic and light towing. The mu‑X’s 5‑speed automatic and RWD layout are adequate for most road conditions, though it lacks the 4×4 drivetrain often expected in an SUV. The Toyota 86, by contrast, is a two‑door coupe aimed at driving enthusiasts. It packs a 2.0‑L naturally aspirated flat‑four that makes 200 PS but only 205 Nm of torque high in the rev range (6400‑6600 rpm), delivering a sportier feel but less low‑speed grunt. Its unibody construction, limited seating (2+2) and higher price make it less practical for everyday family use. In short, choose the Isuzu mu‑X for versatility, lower price and torque‑rich diesel performance; opt for the Toyota 86 only if a pure, high‑rev sports experience is the priority, accepting the higher cost and reduced practicality.

Frequently asked questions

Which vehicle is cheaper?

The Isuzu mu‑X 2.5 LS‑A is priced at ₱1,778,000, which is ₱83,000 less than the Toyota 86 Aero at ₱1,861,000.

Which has more power?

The Toyota 86 Aero produces 200 PS, higher than the Isuzu mu‑X’s 136 PS, but the mu‑X offers significantly more torque (320 Nm vs 205 Nm).

Which is more practical for daily use?

The Isuzu mu‑X is more practical: it has five doors, seats up to seven (2+3+2), and a larger footprint, while the Toyota 86 is a two‑door coupe with only 2+2 seating.

Are both models still available?

The Isuzu mu‑X is listed as discontinued, and the Toyota 86 is marked as not available, meaning neither can be bought new from dealers at present.