Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-A 4×4 AT Dsl (2015) vs Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-A 4×4 AT Dsl (2015) vs Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-A 4×4 AT Dsl (2015) Isuzu ₱1,728,000 | Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015) Toyota ₱1,861,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Not available |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Flat-4 |
| Displacement | 2999cc | 1998cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | DOHC 16-valve |
| Aspiration | Turbo Intercooled, VGS | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gas |
| Max Power | 163 PS @ 3200 rpm | 200 PS @ 7000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 380 Nm @ 1800 - 2200 rpm | 205 Nm @ 6400-6600 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed A/T | 6-Speed A/T |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Segment | J | S |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3+2 | 2+2 |
| Length (mm) | 4825 | 4255 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 | 1795 |
| Height (mm) | 1840 | 1285 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2845 | 2570 |
| Construction | — | Unibody |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 1298 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | Double Wishbone w/ Coil Springs, Stabilizer | MacPherson |
| Rear Suspension | Five-Link Coil Spring, Stabilizer | Double Wishbone |
| Front Wheels | 17-inch alloys | 17x7" Alloys |
| Rear Wheels | 17-inch alloys | 17x7" Alloys |
| Front Tires | 255/65/R17 | 215/45 R17 |
| Rear Tires | 255/65/R17 | 215/45 R17 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | — |
| Steering Column | tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Steering Ratio | — | 5.4 |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | No |
| Brake Assist | Yes | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control | Dual Zone Automatic Climate Control |
| Rear A/C Vents | Yes | No |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather with Red Stitching |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | No |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Navigation | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Apple CarPlay | No | No |
| Android Auto | No | No |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | Yes | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 6 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID + Foglamps | HID |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-A 4×4 AT Dsl (2015) vs Toyota 86 Aero 2.0 MT (White Pearl) (2015): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for an SUV with good power and towing capacity, the Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-A is recommended over the Toyota 86 Aero. The Isuzu offers more torque and power, making it better suited for off-road conditions or towing. For those who prefer a smaller car but still want some performance, the Toyota 86 is preferable due to its higher power output.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper between Isuzu mu-X and Toyota 86?
The Isuzu mu-X starts at ₱1,728,000 while the Toyota 86 Aero costs ₱1,861,000. So, the Isuzu mu-X is cheaper by ₱133,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Toyota 86 Aero outpowers the Isuzu mu-X with a maximum of 200 PS compared to the Isuzu's 163 PS.
Is one vehicle better for daily commuting than the other?
Daily commuting is best suited for the Toyota 86 Aero, which has a smaller size and better fuel economy. The Isuzu mu-X is larger and less efficient for city driving.
Which car offers more seating capacity?
The Toyota 86 Aero can seat two passengers in front and two behind, totaling four seats. In contrast, the Isuzu mu-X has a total of six seats (2+3+2).