Jeep Cherokee Trailhawk 2.4 AT (2015) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Jeep Cherokee Trailhawk 2.4 AT (2015) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Jeep Cherokee Trailhawk 2.4 AT (2015) Jeep ₱2,990,000 | Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026) Ford ₱3,499,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 3-years/100,000 km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 2360cc | — |
| Valvetrain | SOHC 16-valve | — |
| Aspiration | MultiAir 2 | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 184 PS @ 6250 rpm | 394 PS |
| Max Torque | 232 Nm @ 4800 rpm | 676 Nm |
| Transmission | 9-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | AWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Midsize Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | SUV |
| Construction | Body-On-Frame | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 0 | 4713 |
| Width (mm) | 0 | 1881 |
| Height (mm) | 0 | 1627 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 0 | 2984 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Shadow Black, Star White, Velocity Blue Metallic, Glacier Gray, Grabber Yellow |
| Curb Weight (kg) | — | 2084 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | no | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | no | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Wheels | 17x7.5" Alloys | 19 |
| Rear Wheels | 17x7.5" Alloys | 19 |
| Front Tires | 245/65 R17 | 225/55R19 |
| Rear Tires | 245/65 R17 | 225/55R19 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Parking Sensors | Yes | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | Yes | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | Yes | Yes |
| Hill Descent Control | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | Yes | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Dual Zone Climate Control | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | EPB | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | Yes | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | No | No |
| SD Card Slot | Yes | No |
| Speakers | — | 9 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | Yes |
Jeep Cherokee Trailhawk 2.4 AT (2015) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium AWD (2026): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer weighing cost, power and practical features, the 2015 Jeep Cherokee Trailhawk 2.4 AT remains the more economical choice with a price of ₱2,990,000 versus the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach‑E Premium AWD at ₱3,499,000. The Cherokee offers a 4WD drivetrain and a body‑on‑frame construction that suits rough terrain or off‑road adventures, while the Mach‑E is an all‑electric midsize crossover with AWD but no off‑road capability. In terms of power, the Mach‑E’s electric motor delivers 394 PS and a massive 676 Nm torque, far surpassing the Cherokee’s 184 PS at 6,250 rpm and 232 Nm torque. However, the Cherokee’s gasoline engine may be more familiar to Filipino drivers and easier to service in remote areas. The Mustang Mach‑E provides a longer wheelbase (4,713 mm) and higher ground clearance (1,627 mm), offering a smoother ride for city commutes. The Cherokee’s 5‑door layout and 2+3 seating are identical to the Mach‑E, but its body‑on‑frame design may limit interior space compared to the unibody Mach‑E. Ultimately, if a buyer prioritizes lower upfront cost and off‑road capability, the Cherokee is preferable; if maximum power, electric efficiency and a more modern crossover feel are desired, the Mustang Mach‑E is the better pick.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Jeep Cherokee Trailhawk 2.4 AT costs ₱2,990,000, while the Ford Mustang Mach‑E Premium AWD is priced at ₱3,499,000.
Which vehicle has more power?
The Mustang Mach‑E’s electric motor produces 394 PS and 676 Nm torque, compared to the Cherokee’s 184 PS and 232 Nm.
Which vehicle is better for off‑road use?
The Cherokee’s 4WD drivetrain and body‑on‑frame construction make it more suitable for off‑road conditions than the Mustang Mach‑E’s unibody crossover design.
Which vehicle is more suitable for daily commuting?
The Mustang Mach‑E offers a longer wheelbase, higher ground clearance and electric efficiency, which can be advantageous for city driving, whereas the Cherokee’s gasoline engine may appeal to drivers preferring conventional fuel and lower maintenance in rural areas.