Kia Picanto 1.0 EX Hatchback MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Kia Picanto 1.0 EX Hatchback MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Kia Picanto 1.0 EX Hatchback MT (2015) Kia ₱575,000 | Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016) Mitsubishi ₱688,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 |
| Warranty | 160,000km/5-years | 100,000km/3-years |
| Availability | Discontinued | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-3 | Inline-3 |
| Displacement | 998cc | 1193cc |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 12-valve | DOHC 12-valve |
| Aspiration | Naturally Aspirated, Dual CVVT | Naturally Aspirated |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Gas |
| Max Power | 69 PS @ 6200 rpm | 78 PS @ 6000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 94 Nm @ 3500 rpm | 100 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Transmission | 5-Speed M/T | INVECS-III CVT |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
| Compression Ratio | — | 10.5 : 1 |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Segment | A | B |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 5 |
| Length (mm) | 3595 | 3795 |
| Width (mm) | 1595 | 1665 |
| Height (mm) | 1490 | 1500 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2385 | 2450 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 865 | 845 |
| Fuel Tank (L) | — | 35 |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Torsion Beam | Torsion Beam |
| Front Wheels | 14x5.0" Steel Rims | 14x4.5 |
| Rear Wheels | 14x5.0" Steel Rims | 14x4.5 |
| Front Tires | 165/60 R14 | 165/65 R14 |
| Rear Tires | 165/60 R14 | 165/65 R14 |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Drum | Drum |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Electronic |
| Steering Column | Tilt | tilt |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | No |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | No | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | No | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | No |
| Stability Control | No | No |
| Traction Control | No | No |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | No |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | No |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | No |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | No |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | keyless | Central Locking |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Manual Aircon | Manual Aircon |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Fabric | Fabric |
| Parking Brake | Manual | Manual |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | No |
| Cruise Control | No | No |
| Multi-Info Display | No | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | No |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | No | No |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | No |
| Eco Mode | No | Yes |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| AUX Input | Yes | Yes |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | Yes |
| DVD Player | No | Yes |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | Yes |
| iPod Support | No | Yes |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 4 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | Halogen | Halogen |
| Fog Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Daytime Running Lights | No | No |
| Performance & Economy | ||
| Emission Standard | — | Euro-4 |
Kia Picanto 1.0 EX Hatchback MT (2015) vs Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX CVT (2016): which should you buy?
For a Filipino buyer looking for an economical and practical city car, the Kia Picanto is the better choice. Despite being discontinued, it offers more power and better fuel efficiency at a lower price compared to the Mitsubishi Mirage. The Kia Picanto's 69 PS and 94 Nm torque are sufficient for daily use, while its warranty of 160,000km/5-years is longer than the Mitsubishi's 100,000km/3-years. For those seeking a current model with better features and emission standards, the Mitsubishi Mirage might be a more suitable option.
Frequently asked questions
Which car has better fuel efficiency?
The Kia Picanto offers better fuel efficiency as it has higher torque (94 Nm) compared to the Mitsubishi Mirage's 100 Nm, which is less efficient for city driving.
Is one of these cars more powerful than the other?
Yes, the Mitsubishi Mirage outpowers the Kia Picanto. The Mitsubishi Mirage produces 78 PS at 6000 rpm, while the Kia Picanto generates only 69 PS at 6200 rpm, making the Mirage slightly more powerful.
Which car is better for daily commuting?
The Kia Picanto is a better choice for daily commuting due to its higher torque and lower price. It also has a longer warranty period of 160,000km/5-years compared to the Mitsubishi's 100,000km/3-years.
Which car comes with a more advanced transmission?
The Mitsubishi Mirage features an INVECS-III CVT transmission which is considered more advanced than the Kia Picanto's 5-Speed M/T. However, both transmissions are suitable for daily driving needs.