Land Rover Evoque AT (2015) vs Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026)
A full spec-by-spec comparison of Land Rover Evoque AT (2015) vs Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026) — engine, performance, dimensions, features and price, with the differences highlighted to help you decide.
| Specification | Land Rover Evoque AT (2015) Land Rover ₱5,350,000 | Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026) Hyundai ₱4,580,000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Model Year | 2015 | 2026 |
| Warranty | 100,000km/3-years | 5-years/200,000km |
| Availability | Current | Current |
| Engine & Drivetrain | ||
| Engine Type | Inline-4 | Electric Motor |
| Displacement | 1999cc | — |
| Valvetrain | DOHC 16-valve | — |
| Aspiration | Turbo Direct Injection | — |
| Fuel Type | Gas | Electric |
| Max Power | 240 PS @ 5500 rpm | 304 PS |
| Max Torque | 339 Nm @ 1750 rpm | 608 Nm |
| Transmission | 6-Speed A/T | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | 4WD | AWD |
| Body & Dimensions | ||
| Body Type | SUV | Large Crossover SUV |
| Segment | J | Crossover |
| Construction | Unibody | Unibody |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seating Capacity | 2+3 | 2+2+3 |
| Length (mm) | 4365 | 5060 |
| Width (mm) | 1965 | 1980 |
| Height (mm) | 1635 | 1790 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2660 | 3130 |
| Curb Weight (kg) | 1640 | 2505 |
| Exterior Colors | — | Serenity White, Abyss Black, Biophilic Blue, Nocturne Grey, Ionosphere Green, Celadon Grey |
| Chassis, Wheels & Brakes | ||
| Front Suspension | MacPherson | MacPherson Strut w/Coil Spring |
| Rear Suspension | Multi-Link | Multi-link with Coil Spring |
| Front Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Rear Brakes | Disc | Disc |
| Steering Type | hydraulic | EPS |
| Steering Column | tilt | Tilt & Telescope |
| Tire Pressure Monitoring | No | Yes |
| Differential Lock | No | No |
| Front Wheels | — | 21 |
| Rear Wheels | — | 21 |
| Front Tires | — | 285/45R21 |
| Rear Tires | — | 285/45R21 |
| Safety | ||
| Anti-lock Braking (ABS) | Yes | Yes |
| Electronic Brakeforce Distribution | Yes | Yes |
| Brake Assist | No | No |
| Parking Sensors | No | Yes |
| Stability Control | Yes | Yes |
| Traction Control | No | Yes |
| Vehicle Dynamic Control | No | — |
| Forward Collision Mitigation | No | No |
| Blind Spot Warning | No | No |
| Hill Start Assist | No | No |
| Hill Descent Control | No | Yes |
| Auto Stop/Start | No | No |
| Driver Airbag | No | Yes |
| Knee Airbag | No | No |
| Passenger Airbag | No | Yes |
| Front Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Curtain Airbags | No | Yes |
| Rear Side Airbags | No | Yes |
| Security Alarm | Yes | Yes |
| Door Locking | Central Locking | Central Locking |
| Engine Immobilizer | — | Yes |
| Comfort & Convenience | ||
| Air Conditioning | Auto Climate Control System | Automatic Climate Control Dual Zone |
| Rear A/C Vents | No | Yes |
| Seat Material | Leather | Leather |
| Parking Brake | Electronic | EPB |
| Key Type | Keyless Entry | Keyless Entry |
| Push-Button Start | No | Yes |
| Cruise Control | No | Yes |
| Multi-Info Display | Yes | Yes |
| Paddle Shifters | No | No |
| Reverse Camera | No | Yes |
| Auto Headlights | No | No |
| Power Windows | Yes | Yes |
| Power Seats | Yes | Yes |
| Remote Trunk Release | No | Yes |
| Eco Mode | No | No |
| Antenna | yes | yes |
| Infotainment & Audio | ||
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Navigation | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| Apple CarPlay | No | Yes |
| Android Auto | No | Yes |
| USB | Yes | No |
| AUX Input | Yes | No |
| AM/FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| CD Player | Yes | No |
| DVD Player | No | No |
| MP3 Playback | Yes | No |
| iPod Support | Yes | No |
| SD Card Slot | No | No |
| Speakers | — | 14 |
| Lighting | ||
| Headlights | HID + Foglamps | LED |
| Fog Lights | Yes | No |
| Daytime Running Lights | — | Yes |
Land Rover Evoque AT (2015) vs Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026): which should you buy?
For Filipino buyers, the Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range (2026) is the more compelling choice. At ₱4,580,000, it's ₱770,000 cheaper than the Land Rover Evoque AT (2015) at ₱5,350,000. The IONIQ 9 offers higher power (304 PS vs 240 PS) and significantly more torque (608 Nm vs 339 Nm), plus a larger body (5,060 mm length vs 4,365 mm) and 7-seat capacity (2+2+3) versus the Evoque's 5 seats. Its electric motor provides instant torque and lower running costs, though charging infrastructure in the Philippines remains a consideration. The IONIQ 9 also comes with a longer warranty (5 years/200,000 km vs 3 years/100,000 km). However, the Evoque is a gasoline vehicle with no range anxiety and a smaller footprint, better suited for those who prefer a compact luxury SUV and have limited access to charging. For families needing space, modern features, and lower total cost of ownership, the IONIQ 9 is the smarter buy. The Evoque appeals only to buyers who prioritize a traditional gasoline powertrain and a smaller, more maneuverable SUV, but its higher price and older model year make it less competitive.
Frequently asked questions
Which vehicle is cheaper?
The Hyundai IONIQ 9 Calligraphy AWD Long Range is cheaper at ₱4,580,000 compared to the Land Rover Evoque AT at ₱5,350,000, a difference of ₱770,000.
Which vehicle is more powerful?
The Hyundai IONIQ 9 is more powerful with 304 PS and 608 Nm of torque, versus the Land Rover Evoque's 240 PS and 339 Nm.
Which vehicle is better for daily commuting?
The Hyundai IONIQ 9 offers more interior space (7 seats) and a larger body, making it better for family commuting, but requires charging. The Land Rover Evoque is smaller and runs on gasoline, which may be more convenient for everyday use without charging concerns.
Which vehicle has a better warranty?
The Hyundai IONIQ 9 has a longer warranty: 5 years/200,000 km compared to the Land Rover Evoque's 3 years/100,000 km.